HACK vs. IHAK
HACK (ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF) and IHAK (iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - HACK tracks the Prime Cyber Defense Index while IHAK tracks the NYSE FactSet Global Cyber Security Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HACK returned 11.58%/yr vs 7.79%/yr for IHAK. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HACK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IHAK.
Performance
HACK vs. IHAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a 25.84% return, which is significantly higher than IHAK's 22.96% return.
HACK
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 20.74%
- YTD
- 25.84%
- 6M
- 20.06%
- 1Y
- 20.71%
- 3Y*
- 27.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.72%
IHAK
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 19.29%
- YTD
- 22.96%
- 6M
- 19.22%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 17.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- —
HACK vs. IHAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 25.84% | 7.97% | 23.49% | 37.44% | -28.16% | 7.03% | 41.51% | 5.91% |
IHAK iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF | 22.96% | -1.29% | 7.60% | 37.77% | -25.81% | 11.13% | 51.22% | 6.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between HACK and IHAK is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between HACK and IHAK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
HACK vs. IHAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HACK
IHAK
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
HACK
IHAK
Industrials
HACK
IHAK
Financial Services
HACK
IHAK
-
Basic Materials
HACK
-
IHAK
-
Communication Services
HACK
-
IHAK
Consumer Cyclical
HACK
-
IHAK
-
Consumer Defensive
HACK
-
IHAK
-
Energy
HACK
-
IHAK
-
Healthcare
HACK
-
IHAK
-
Real Estate
HACK
-
IHAK
-
Utilities
HACK
-
IHAK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HACK vs. IHAK — Risk / Return Rank
HACK
IHAK
HACK vs. IHAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF (IHAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HACK | IHAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.13 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 0.64 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.42 | 1.50 | +0.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HACK | IHAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.62 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.33 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.55 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
HACK vs. IHAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, which is greater than IHAK's maximum drawdown of -34.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and IHAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HACK | IHAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.68% | -34.42% | -8.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.67% | -23.48% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.90% | -23.48% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.68% | -34.42% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.01% | -3.03% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -10.76% | -0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.58% | 9.98% | -1.40% |
Volatility
HACK vs. IHAK - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) has a higher volatility of 10.82% compared to iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF (IHAK) at 9.43%. This indicates that HACK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HACK | IHAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.82% | 9.43% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.54% | 19.92% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.47% | 24.03% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 23.57% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 24.41% | -1.14% |
HACK vs. IHAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IHAK's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
HACK vs. IHAK - Dividend Comparison
HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than IHAK's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
IHAK iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.13% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.40% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HACK and IHAK have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HACK has higher volatility (10.82%) compared to IHAK (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACK dropped -42.68% vs IHAK's -34.42%.
On 5-year performance, HACK leads with 11.58% vs 7.79% for IHAK. On fees, IHAK is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IHAK has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HACK has performed better with a 11.58% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHAK is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.
IHAK has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.
HACK tracks Prime Cyber Defense Index, while IHAK tracks NYSE FactSet Global Cyber Security Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HACK and 0.47% for IHAK.
HACK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HACK and IHAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer