PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXTG vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXTG vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 8.89% return.


GXTG

1D
3.13%
1M
-3.78%
6M
-0.36%
YTD
1.80%
1Y
-4.66%
3Y*
-2.08%
5Y*
-12.79%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.19%

XYLD

1D
0.24%
1M
2.61%
6M
7.72%
YTD
8.89%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
12.21%
5Y*
7.93%
10Y*
8.30%
ALL TIME*
8.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$123.03K$106.22K$198.85K
$31.68M$34.09M$32.56M

GXTG vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GXTG
Global X Thematic Growth ETF
1.80%3.52%-3.55%10.26%-48.08%3.21%61.07%4.74%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
8.89%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%3.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GXTG and XYLD is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019

0.60

The correlation between GXTG and XYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GXTG vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GXTG
XYLD

Technology

22.3%
38.5%

Basic Materials

14.4%
1.7%

Utilities

12.4%
2.2%

Communication Services

11.7%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
9.5%

Healthcare

10.5%
8.9%

Industrials

8.0%
8.4%

Real Estate

6.9%
1.8%

Financial Services

2.3%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.0%

Technology

GXTG
22.3%
XYLD
38.5%

Basic Materials

GXTG
14.4%
XYLD
1.7%

Utilities

GXTG
12.4%
XYLD
2.2%

Communication Services

GXTG
11.7%
XYLD
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GXTG
11.5%
XYLD
9.5%

Healthcare

GXTG
10.5%
XYLD
8.9%

Industrials

GXTG
8.0%
XYLD
8.4%

Real Estate

GXTG
6.9%
XYLD
1.8%

Financial Services

GXTG
2.3%
XYLD
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

GXTG

-

XYLD
4.5%

Energy

GXTG

-

XYLD
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXTG vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GXTG
GXTG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
GXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GXTG vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXTGXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.60

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

3.54

-3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.37

18.41

-18.78

GXTG vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXTG Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXTG and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXTG vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXTGXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.81%

-33.46%

-34.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.14%

-5.29%

-23.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.14%

-15.53%

-13.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.17%

-18.66%

-42.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.76%

0.00%

-59.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.43%

-3.67%

-39.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.71%

1.02%

+11.69%

Volatility

GXTG vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 13.53% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.93%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXTGXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.53%

1.93%

+11.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.87%

5.98%

+19.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.66%

7.09%

+24.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.78%

11.27%

+17.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.15%

14.16%

+15.99%

GXTG vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXTG vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than XYLD's 10.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXTG
Global X Thematic Growth ETF
1.47%1.40%1.08%1.99%1.48%1.56%0.48%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.45%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXTG and XYLD have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GXTG has higher volatility (13.53%) compared to XYLD (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

On 5-year performance, XYLD leads with 7.93% vs -12.79% for GXTG. On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 7.93% return vs -12.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.45%, compared with 1.47% for GXTG.

GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXTG and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer