XYLD vs. VOO
XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XYLD returned 8.46%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
XYLD vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, XYLD has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.46%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.
XYLD
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- 1Y
- 17.60%
- 3Y*
- 11.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
XYLD vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 5.47% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -12.05% | 19.59% | -0.56% | 21.41% | -6.09% | 16.49% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLD and VOO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013 | 0.81 |
The correlation between XYLD and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
XYLD vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XYLD
VOO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XYLD
VOO
Financial Services
XYLD
VOO
Communication Services
XYLD
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
XYLD
VOO
Healthcare
XYLD
VOO
Industrials
XYLD
VOO
Consumer Defensive
XYLD
VOO
Energy
XYLD
VOO
Utilities
XYLD
VOO
Real Estate
XYLD
VOO
Basic Materials
XYLD
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLD vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
XYLD
VOO
XYLD vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XYLD | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.39 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.02 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.53 | 13.58 | +3.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XYLD vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLD | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.46% | -33.99% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.29% | -8.90% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.53% | -18.69% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.66% | -24.52% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.46% | -33.99% | +0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -1.74% | +1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -3.68% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 1.98% | -0.97% |
Volatility
XYLD vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 2.16%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLD | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.16% | 4.60% | -2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.76% | 9.73% | -3.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.80% | 12.39% | -5.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.26% | 16.90% | -5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 18.05% | -3.84% |
XYLD vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYLD vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.39%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 11.39% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLD and VOO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to XYLD (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.77% vs 8.46% for XYLD. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.39%, compared with 1.04% for VOO.
XYLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while VOO is S&P 500. XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XYLD and 0.03% for VOO.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XYLD and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer