XYLD vs. RYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD).
XYLD and RYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE S&P 500 2% OTM BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2013. RYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Apr 17, 2019. Both XYLD and RYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XYLD or RYLD.
Performance
XYLD vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 15.79% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's 9.56% return.
XYLD
15.79%
1.48%
9.72%
18.57%
6.63%
6.77%
RYLD
9.56%
2.45%
7.01%
12.60%
3.44%
N/A
Key characteristics
| XYLD | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.69 | 1.18 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.65 | 1.71 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.70 | 1.23 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.05 | 0.68 |
| Martin Ratio | 23.50 | 7.05 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.79% | 1.70% |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.90% | 10.17% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.46% | -41.52% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.16% | -7.16% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XYLD vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XYLD and RYLD have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Correlation
The correlation between XYLD and RYLD is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XYLD vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XYLD vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison
XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.43%, less than RYLD's 11.98% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 9.43% | 10.51% | 13.44% | 9.08% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 4.67% | 3.24% | 4.65% | 4.15% | 2.49% |
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | 11.98% | 12.65% | 13.50% | 12.35% | 10.77% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XYLD vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and RYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XYLD vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 2.45%, while Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.