GXTG vs. WDIV
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) are both Global Equities funds - GXTG tracks the Solactive Thematic Growth Index while WDIV tracks the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXTG returned -7.87%/yr vs 7.57%/yr for WDIV. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for WDIV.
Performance
GXTG vs. WDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 25.21% return, which is significantly higher than WDIV's 8.20% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 25.21%
- 6M
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- -7.87%
- 10Y*
- —
WDIV
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 10.40%
- 1Y
- 21.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
GXTG vs. WDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 25.21% | 3.52% | -3.55% | 10.26% | -48.08% | 3.21% | 61.07% | 4.70% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 8.20% | 27.16% | 7.61% | 8.21% | -6.92% | 14.44% | -10.18% | 3.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and WDIV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019 | 0.58 |
The correlation between GXTG and WDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
GXTG vs. WDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXTG
WDIV
Technology
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Technology
GXTG
WDIV
Basic Materials
GXTG
WDIV
Utilities
GXTG
WDIV
Communication Services
GXTG
WDIV
Consumer Cyclical
GXTG
WDIV
Healthcare
GXTG
WDIV
Industrials
GXTG
WDIV
Real Estate
GXTG
WDIV
Financial Services
GXTG
WDIV
Consumer Defensive
GXTG
-
WDIV
Energy
GXTG
-
WDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. WDIV — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
WDIV
GXTG vs. WDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXTG | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.39 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 2.55 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 9.39 | -7.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXTG | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 2.16 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.60 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.46 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. WDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than WDIV's maximum drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and WDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -42.34% | -25.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.65% | -8.61% | -16.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.89% | -11.26% | -20.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -22.12% | -39.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.50% | -1.25% | -49.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.09% | -5.85% | -37.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.35% | 2.33% | +8.02% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. WDIV - Volatility Comparison
Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 10.21% compared to SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) at 2.95%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.21% | 2.95% | +7.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.97% | 8.01% | +10.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.52% | 10.18% | +15.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 12.77% | +14.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.59% | 15.40% | +14.19% |
GXTG vs. WDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WDIV's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. WDIV - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than WDIV's 4.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.12% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 4.04% | 4.27% | 4.63% | 4.73% | 5.12% | 4.15% | 5.55% | 3.99% | 4.42% | 3.62% | 4.32% | 5.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and WDIV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXTG has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to WDIV (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs WDIV's -42.34%.
On 5-year performance, WDIV leads with 7.57% vs -7.87% for GXTG. On fees, WDIV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, WDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, WDIV has performed better with a 7.57% return vs -7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WDIV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXTG.
WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 1.12% for GXTG.
GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.40% for WDIV.
WDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and WDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer