WDIV vs. VYM
WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WDIV returned 7.80%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for VYM. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WDIV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
WDIV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, WDIV has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 7.80%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.
WDIV
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 7.84%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 20.83%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
VYM
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 25.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
WDIV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 7.84% | 27.16% | 7.61% | 8.21% | -6.92% | 14.44% | -10.18% | 20.12% | -8.81% | 19.03% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 11.70% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDIV and VYM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2013 | 0.78 |
The correlation between WDIV and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
WDIV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WDIV
VYM
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
WDIV
VYM
Real Estate
WDIV
VYM
Utilities
WDIV
VYM
Energy
WDIV
VYM
Industrials
WDIV
VYM
Communication Services
WDIV
VYM
Consumer Defensive
WDIV
VYM
Basic Materials
WDIV
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
WDIV
VYM
Technology
WDIV
VYM
Healthcare
WDIV
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDIV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
WDIV
VYM
WDIV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDIV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 3.79 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.93 | 14.09 | -5.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDIV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDIV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -56.98% | +14.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -6.69% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.26% | -14.46% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.12% | -15.84% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.34% | -35.21% | -7.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | -1.12% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -7.18% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 1.80% | +0.54% |
Volatility
WDIV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) have volatilities of 3.07% and 3.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDIV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 3.02% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.32% | 7.64% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.31% | 10.41% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.77% | 13.93% | -1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 16.35% | -0.99% |
WDIV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDIV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, more than VYM's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 5.94% | 4.27% | 4.63% | 4.73% | 5.12% | 4.15% | 5.55% | 3.99% | 4.42% | 3.62% | 4.32% | 5.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDIV and VYM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WDIV has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to VYM (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDIV dropped -42.34% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 12.00% vs 7.80% for WDIV. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 12.00% return vs 7.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for WDIV.
WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 5.94%, compared with 2.29% for VYM.
WDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while VYM is Dividend. WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDIV and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer