PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDIV vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDIV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, WDIV has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 7.80%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.


WDIV

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
7.84%
6M
8.44%
1Y
20.83%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
7.80%

VYM

1D
0.11%
1M
0.42%
YTD
11.70%
6M
11.13%
1Y
25.24%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
12.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDIV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
7.84%27.16%7.61%8.21%-6.92%14.44%-10.18%20.12%-8.81%19.03%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
11.70%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between WDIV and VYM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2013

0.78

The correlation between WDIV and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

WDIV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WDIV
VYM

Financial Services

19.1%
19.9%

Real Estate

8.2%
0.0%

Utilities

7.5%
5.4%

Energy

7.4%
9.1%

Industrials

6.0%
11.8%

Communication Services

5.1%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
8.0%

Basic Materials

4.5%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
6.6%

Technology

2.4%
20.3%

Healthcare

2.2%
12.2%

Financial Services

WDIV
19.1%
VYM
19.9%

Real Estate

WDIV
8.2%
VYM
0.0%

Utilities

WDIV
7.5%
VYM
5.4%

Energy

WDIV
7.4%
VYM
9.1%

Industrials

WDIV
6.0%
VYM
11.8%

Communication Services

WDIV
5.1%
VYM
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

WDIV
4.6%
VYM
8.0%

Basic Materials

WDIV
4.5%
VYM
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

WDIV
3.9%
VYM
6.6%

Technology

WDIV
2.4%
VYM
20.3%

Healthcare

WDIV
2.2%
VYM
12.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDIV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDIV
WDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDIV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WDIVVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.44

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

3.79

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.93

14.09

-5.16

WDIV vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDIV and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WDIV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDIVVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.34%

-56.98%

+14.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-6.69%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.26%

-14.46%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-15.84%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.34%

-35.21%

-7.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.99%

-1.12%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-7.18%

+1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

1.80%

+0.54%

Volatility

WDIV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) have volatilities of 3.07% and 3.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDIVVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

3.02%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

7.64%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.31%

10.41%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.77%

13.93%

-1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

16.35%

-0.99%

WDIV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDIV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, more than VYM's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.29%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
5.94%4.27%4.63%4.73%5.12%4.15%5.55%3.99%4.42%3.62%4.32%5.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDIV and VYM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WDIV has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to VYM (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDIV dropped -42.34% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 12.00% vs 7.80% for WDIV. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 12.00% return vs 7.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for WDIV.

WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 5.94%, compared with 2.29% for VYM.

WDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while VYM is Dividend. WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDIV and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer