WDIV vs. IVV
WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WDIV returned 7.81%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for IVV. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WDIV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
WDIV vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WDIV having a 7.89% return and IVV slightly higher at 8.20%. Over the past 10 years, WDIV has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 7.81%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.
WDIV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 19.92%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.81%
IVV
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 23.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
WDIV vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 7.89% | 27.16% | 7.61% | 8.21% | -6.92% | 14.44% | -10.18% | 20.12% | -8.81% | 19.03% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.20% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDIV and IVV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2013 | 0.71 |
The correlation between WDIV and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WDIV vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WDIV
IVV
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
WDIV
IVV
Real Estate
WDIV
IVV
Utilities
WDIV
IVV
Energy
WDIV
IVV
Industrials
WDIV
IVV
Communication Services
WDIV
IVV
Consumer Defensive
WDIV
IVV
Basic Materials
WDIV
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
WDIV
IVV
Technology
WDIV
IVV
Healthcare
WDIV
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDIV vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
WDIV
IVV
WDIV vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDIV | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 2.68 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 11.98 | -3.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDIV vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDIV | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -55.25% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -8.89% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.26% | -18.75% | +7.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.12% | -24.53% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.34% | -33.90% | -8.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -3.14% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -10.76% | +4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 1.99% | +0.35% |
Volatility
WDIV vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) is 3.05%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that WDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDIV | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 4.88% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.32% | 9.85% | -1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 12.48% | -2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.77% | 16.98% | -4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 18.07% | -2.83% |
WDIV vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDIV vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than IVV's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.11% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 4.29% | 4.27% | 4.63% | 4.73% | 5.12% | 4.15% | 5.55% | 3.99% | 4.42% | 3.62% | 4.32% | 5.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDIV and IVV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVV has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to WDIV (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDIV dropped -42.34% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.58% vs 7.81% for WDIV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, WDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for WDIV.
WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 1.11% for IVV.
WDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.03% for IVV.
WDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDIV and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer