GXTG vs. RBIL

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GXTG returned -4.66% vs 3.85% for RBIL. Their -0.20 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

GXTG vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.64% return.

GXTG

• 1D: 3.13%
• 1M: -3.78%
• 6M: -0.36%
• YTD: 1.80%
• 1Y: -4.66%
• 3Y*: -2.08%
• 5Y*: -12.79%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.19%

RBIL

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 2.28%
• YTD: 2.64%
• 1Y: 3.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF	$123.03K	$106.22K	$198.85K
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	$1.13M	$1.88M	$2.27M

GXTG vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF	1.80%	-1.32%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.64%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GXTG and RBIL is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.20

Return for Risk

GXTG vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GXTG

GXTG Risk / Return Rank: 8
GXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
GXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
GXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 9
GXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
GXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 8

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GXTG vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GXTG	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	4.02	-4.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.01	6.20	-6.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	2.02	-1.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.16	6.87	-7.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.37	27.96	-28.33

GXTG vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXTG Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXTG and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GXTG vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXTG	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.81%	-0.56%	-67.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.14%	-0.56%	-28.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.76%	-0.19%	-59.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.43%	-0.08%	-43.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.71%	0.14%	+12.57%

Volatility

GXTG vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 13.53% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.31%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GXTG	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.53%	0.31%	+13.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.87%	0.89%	+24.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.66%	0.96%	+30.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.78%	1.06%	+27.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.15%	1.06%	+29.09%

GXTG vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXTG vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than RBIL's 4.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF	1.47%	1.40%	1.08%	1.99%	1.48%	1.56%	0.48%	0.31%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.16%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXTG and RBIL in my portfolio?

GXTG and RBIL have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GXTG or RBIL?

GXTG has higher volatility (13.53%) compared to RBIL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs RBIL's -0.56%.

Which ETF is better, GXTG or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 3.85% vs -4.66% for GXTG. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GXTG or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 3.85% return vs -4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXTG or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXTG or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 1.47% for GXTG.

What is the main difference between GXTG and RBIL?

GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.02 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.