GXTG vs. COPX
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXTG returned -7.87%/yr vs 19.87%/yr for COPX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
GXTG vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GXTG having a 25.21% return and COPX slightly higher at 25.71%.
GXTG
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 25.21%
- 6M
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- -7.87%
- 10Y*
- —
COPX
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- 17.74%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- 1Y
- 120.82%
- 3Y*
- 37.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 21.95%
GXTG vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 25.21% | 3.52% | -3.55% | 10.26% | -48.08% | 3.21% | 61.07% | 4.70% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 25.71% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 10.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and COPX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019 | 0.58 |
The correlation between GXTG and COPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
GXTG vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXTG
COPX
Technology
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
GXTG
COPX
-
Basic Materials
GXTG
COPX
Utilities
GXTG
COPX
-
Communication Services
GXTG
COPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
GXTG
COPX
-
Healthcare
GXTG
COPX
-
Industrials
GXTG
COPX
Real Estate
GXTG
COPX
-
Financial Services
GXTG
COPX
-
Consumer Defensive
GXTG
-
COPX
-
Energy
GXTG
-
COPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
COPX
GXTG vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXTG | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.42 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 4.37 | -3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | 14.00 | -11.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXTG | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 2.93 | -2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.55 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.19 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -83.16% | +15.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.65% | -27.82% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.89% | -39.72% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -42.12% | -19.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.50% | -5.69% | -44.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.09% | -39.30% | -3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.35% | 8.66% | +1.69% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) is 10.21%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that GXTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.21% | 15.38% | -5.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.97% | 35.68% | -16.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.52% | 41.41% | -15.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 36.51% | -8.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.59% | 35.55% | -5.96% |
GXTG vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than COPX's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.13% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.12% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and COPX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (15.38%) compared to GXTG (10.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs COPX's -83.16%.
On 5-year performance, COPX leads with 19.87% vs -7.87% for GXTG. On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GXTG has been the lower-risk option at 10.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COPX has performed better with a 19.87% return vs -7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.12% for GXTG.
GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while COPX is Materials. GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.65% for COPX.
COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer