PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXTG vs. PID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXTG vs. PID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 23.43% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 6.41% return.


GXTG

1D
-1.42%
1M
4.46%
YTD
23.43%
6M
17.77%
1Y
19.75%
3Y*
6.30%
5Y*
-8.13%
10Y*

PID

1D
0.91%
1M
1.27%
YTD
6.41%
6M
6.99%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
13.03%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
8.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXTG vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GXTG
Global X Thematic Growth ETF
23.43%3.52%-3.55%10.26%-48.08%3.21%61.07%4.70%
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
6.41%24.45%3.08%14.28%-6.48%24.49%-6.56%5.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GXTG and PID is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019

0.58

The correlation between GXTG and PID shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GXTG vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GXTG
PID

Technology

22.3%
8.7%

Basic Materials

14.4%
3.4%

Utilities

12.4%
14.2%

Communication Services

11.7%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
6.4%

Healthcare

10.5%
8.4%

Industrials

8.0%
7.9%

Real Estate

6.9%
0.4%

Financial Services

2.3%
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.0%

Energy

-

13.3%

Technology

GXTG
22.3%
PID
8.7%

Basic Materials

GXTG
14.4%
PID
3.4%

Utilities

GXTG
12.4%
PID
14.2%

Communication Services

GXTG
11.7%
PID
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GXTG
11.5%
PID
6.4%

Healthcare

GXTG
10.5%
PID
8.4%

Industrials

GXTG
8.0%
PID
7.9%

Real Estate

GXTG
6.9%
PID
0.4%

Financial Services

GXTG
2.3%
PID
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

GXTG

-

PID
6.0%

Energy

GXTG

-

PID
13.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXTG vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXTG
GXTG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

PID
PID Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXTG vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GXTGPIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.32

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

2.34

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.91

8.00

-6.08

GXTG vs. PID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the PID Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXTG and PID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXTGPIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.80

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.61

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.27

-0.16

Drawdowns

GXTG vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, roughly equal to the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and PID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXTGPIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.81%

-66.34%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.65%

-7.47%

-17.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.89%

-13.34%

-18.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.17%

-22.97%

-38.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.21%

-1.31%

-49.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.09%

-13.03%

-30.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.36%

2.19%

+8.17%

Volatility

GXTG vs. PID - Volatility Comparison

Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 10.10% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.74%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXTGPIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.10%

2.74%

+7.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.04%

7.67%

+11.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.56%

9.74%

+15.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.63%

13.97%

+13.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.59%

17.84%

+11.75%

GXTG vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXTG vs. PID - Dividend Comparison

GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than PID's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXTG
Global X Thematic Growth ETF
1.14%1.40%1.08%1.99%1.48%1.56%0.48%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
3.24%3.28%3.88%3.31%3.30%3.30%3.16%3.99%3.87%3.46%3.90%4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXTG and PID have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GXTG has higher volatility (10.10%) compared to PID (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs PID's -66.34%.

On 5-year performance, PID leads with 8.48% vs -8.13% for GXTG. On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PID has performed better with a 8.48% return vs -8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.

PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 1.14% for GXTG.

GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.56% for PID.

PID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXTG and PID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer