PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PID vs. PSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PID vs. PSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PID achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly higher than PSQ's -12.96% return. Over the past 10 years, PID has outperformed PSQ with an annualized return of 8.62%, while PSQ has yielded a comparatively lower -18.71% annualized return.


PID

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.12%
6M
4.17%
YTD
5.78%
1Y
13.95%
3Y*
11.75%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
8.62%

PSQ

1D
1.93%
1M
1.24%
6M
-11.29%
YTD
-12.96%
1Y
-19.78%
3Y*
-16.20%
5Y*
-12.44%
10Y*
-18.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PID vs. PSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
5.78%24.45%3.08%14.28%-6.48%24.49%-6.56%25.87%-11.46%19.05%
PSQ
ProShares Short QQQ
-12.96%-15.51%-15.68%-32.01%36.40%-24.84%-41.23%-27.49%-2.34%-24.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PID and PSQ is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006

-0.63

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PID and PSQ has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.63 to -0.32, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

PID vs. PSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PID
PSQ

Financial Services

17.5%
83.3%

Utilities

15.1%

-

Communication Services

13.7%

-

Energy

12.5%

-

Technology

9.1%

-

Healthcare

8.6%

-

Industrials

7.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%

-

Basic Materials

3.3%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Financial Services

PID
17.5%
PSQ
83.3%

Utilities

PID
15.1%
PSQ

-

Communication Services

PID
13.7%
PSQ

-

Energy

PID
12.5%
PSQ

-

Technology

PID
9.1%
PSQ

-

Healthcare

PID
8.6%
PSQ

-

Industrials

PID
7.5%
PSQ

-

Consumer Defensive

PID
6.2%
PSQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

PID
6.2%
PSQ

-

Basic Materials

PID
3.3%
PSQ

-

Real Estate

PID
0.4%
PSQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PID vs. PSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PID
PID Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

PSQ
PSQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
PSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PID vs. PSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIDPSQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.83

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

-0.80

+2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.85

-1.67

+7.52

PID vs. PSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PID Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the PSQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PID and PSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PID vs. PSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PID drawdown since its inception was -66.34%, smaller than the maximum PSQ drawdown of -98.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PID and PSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIDPSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.34%

-98.26%

+31.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-24.83%

+17.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.34%

-49.65%

+36.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.97%

-60.91%

+37.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.07%

-87.94%

+41.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-98.18%

+96.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.98%

-74.08%

+61.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

11.88%

-9.49%

Volatility

PID vs. PSQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) is 2.74%, while ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that PID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIDPSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

8.62%

-5.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.94%

15.32%

-7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

18.59%

-8.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

22.82%

-8.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

22.40%

-4.83%

PID vs. PSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PID has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than PSQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PID vs. PSQ - Dividend Comparison

PID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than PSQ's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
3.52%3.28%3.88%3.31%3.30%3.30%3.16%3.99%3.87%3.46%3.90%4.48%
PSQ
ProShares Short QQQ
4.40%4.97%7.15%6.01%0.35%0.00%0.31%1.75%0.95%0.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PID and PSQ have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSQ has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to PID (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PID dropped -66.34% vs PSQ's -98.26%.

On 10-year performance, PID leads with 8.62% vs -18.71% for PSQ. On fees, PID is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PID has performed better with a 8.62% return vs -18.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PID is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for PSQ.

PSQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 3.52% for PID.

PID is categorized as Global Equities, while PSQ is Inverse Equities. PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR), while PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PID and 0.95% for PSQ.

PID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PID and PSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer