PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PID vs. PSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PID vs. PSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PID achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly higher than PSQ's -16.09% return. Over the past 10 years, PID has outperformed PSQ with an annualized return of 8.91%, while PSQ has yielded a comparatively lower -19.58% annualized return.


PID

1D
-0.08%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.32%
1Y
13.78%
3Y*
12.10%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
8.91%

PSQ

1D
0.16%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
-16.09%
6M
-15.30%
1Y
-26.34%
3Y*
-18.31%
5Y*
-13.85%
10Y*
-19.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PID vs. PSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
2.80%24.45%3.08%14.28%-6.48%24.49%-6.56%25.87%-11.46%19.05%
PSQ
ProShares Short QQQ
-16.09%-15.51%-15.68%-32.01%36.40%-24.84%-41.23%-27.49%-2.34%-24.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PID and PSQ is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006

-0.63

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PID and PSQ has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.63 to -0.39, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

PID vs. PSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PID
PSQ

Financial Services

17.5%
95.1%

Utilities

15.1%

-

Communication Services

13.7%

-

Energy

12.5%

-

Technology

9.1%

-

Healthcare

8.6%

-

Industrials

7.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%

-

Basic Materials

3.3%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Financial Services

PID
17.5%
PSQ
95.1%

Utilities

PID
15.1%
PSQ

-

Communication Services

PID
13.7%
PSQ

-

Energy

PID
12.5%
PSQ

-

Technology

PID
9.1%
PSQ

-

Healthcare

PID
8.6%
PSQ

-

Industrials

PID
7.5%
PSQ

-

Consumer Defensive

PID
6.2%
PSQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

PID
6.2%
PSQ

-

Basic Materials

PID
3.3%
PSQ

-

Real Estate

PID
0.4%
PSQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PID vs. PSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PID
PID Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

PSQ
PSQ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
PSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
PSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PID vs. PSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIDPSQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.76

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

-1.01

+2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.14

-2.08

+8.22

PID vs. PSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PID Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the PSQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PID and PSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PID vs. PSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PID drawdown since its inception was -66.34%, smaller than the maximum PSQ drawdown of -98.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PID and PSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIDPSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.34%

-98.26%

+31.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-26.08%

+18.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.34%

-49.65%

+36.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.97%

-60.91%

+37.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.07%

-88.98%

+42.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-98.24%

+93.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.01%

-74.02%

+61.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

13.47%

-11.22%

Volatility

PID vs. PSQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) is 2.70%, while ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that PID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIDPSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

8.26%

-5.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.86%

14.12%

-6.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.84%

17.65%

-7.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.96%

22.67%

-8.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.75%

22.38%

-4.63%

PID vs. PSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PID has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than PSQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PID vs. PSQ - Dividend Comparison

PID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, less than PSQ's 5.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
3.62%3.28%3.88%3.31%3.30%3.30%3.16%3.99%3.87%3.46%3.90%4.48%
PSQ
ProShares Short QQQ
5.21%4.97%7.15%6.01%0.35%0.00%0.31%1.75%0.95%0.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PID and PSQ have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSQ has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to PID (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PID dropped -66.34% vs PSQ's -98.26%.

On 10-year performance, PID leads with 8.91% vs -19.58% for PSQ. On fees, PID is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PID has performed better with a 8.91% return vs -19.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PID is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for PSQ.

PSQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.21%, compared with 4.82% for PID.

PID is categorized as Global Equities, while PSQ is Inverse Equities. PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR), while PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PID and 0.95% for PSQ.

PID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PID and PSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer