PID vs. LVHI
PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) and LVHI (Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PID is a Global Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR), while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the QS International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PID returned 8.72%/yr vs 15.87%/yr for LVHI. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PID charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
PID vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PID achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 11.90% return.
PID
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- 1Y
- 17.46%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 11.90%
- 6M
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 29.94%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 15.87%
- 10Y*
- —
PID vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 6.59% | 24.45% | 3.08% | 14.28% | -6.48% | 24.49% | -6.56% | 25.87% | -11.46% | 19.05% |
LVHI Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 11.90% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between PID and LVHI is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016 | 0.65 |
The correlation between PID and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
PID vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PID
LVHI
Financial Services
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
PID
LVHI
Utilities
PID
LVHI
Communication Services
PID
LVHI
Energy
PID
LVHI
Technology
PID
LVHI
Healthcare
PID
LVHI
Industrials
PID
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
PID
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
PID
LVHI
Basic Materials
PID
LVHI
Real Estate
PID
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PID vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
PID
LVHI
PID vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PID | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | 3.18 | -1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | 4.36 | -1.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.60 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 5.01 | -2.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.33 | 20.95 | -12.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PID | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 3.18 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 1.44 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.82 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
PID vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PID drawdown since its inception was -66.34%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PID and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PID | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.34% | -32.31% | -34.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.47% | -6.08% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.34% | -11.99% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.97% | -11.99% | -10.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -1.39% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -3.52% | -9.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 1.45% | +0.73% |
Volatility
PID vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) is 2.55%, while Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that PID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PID | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 3.30% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.55% | 7.51% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.65% | 9.45% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 11.06% | +2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 13.76% | +4.08% |
PID vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PID has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PID vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
PID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than LVHI's 4.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 4.49% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.24% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PID and LVHI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHI has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to PID (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PID dropped -66.34% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.87% vs 8.72% for PID. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.87% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 3.24% for PID.
PID is categorized as Global Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR), while LVHI tracks QS International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PID and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PID and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer