GXTG vs. NZAC
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC).
GXTG and NZAC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GXTG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Thematic Growth Index. It was launched on Oct 25, 2019. NZAC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index. It was launched on Nov 25, 2014. Both GXTG and NZAC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GXTG vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GXTG vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | -6.81% | 3.52% | -3.55% | 10.26% | -48.08% | 3.21% | 61.07% | 4.70% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | -5.23% | 20.55% | 16.67% | 23.22% | -19.77% | 18.35% | 17.21% | 4.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a -6.81% return, which is significantly lower than NZAC's -5.23% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- -6.81%
- 6M
- -17.86%
- 1Y
- -0.43%
- 3Y*
- -2.86%
- 5Y*
- -13.24%
- 10Y*
- —
NZAC
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- -5.23%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- 17.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GXTG vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
NZAC
GXTG vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXTG | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | 0.97 | -0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.17 | 1.51 | -1.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.22 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 1.59 | -1.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 6.70 | -6.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXTG | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | 0.97 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.49 | 0.48 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.54 | -0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and NZAC is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GXTG vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than NZAC's 2.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.51% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 2.01% | 1.90% | 1.88% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.59% | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.20% | 2.00% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than NZAC's maximum drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and NZAC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -33.72% | -34.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.65% | -10.85% | -13.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -28.31% | -32.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.16% | -7.27% | -55.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.76% | -5.39% | -37.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.77% | 2.57% | +7.20% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. NZAC - Volatility Comparison
Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) at 6.18%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NZAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.74% | 6.18% | +2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.65% | 10.07% | +10.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.44% | 17.91% | +9.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.33% | 16.73% | +10.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.54% | 17.09% | +12.45% |