NZAC vs. GABF
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF).
NZAC and GABF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NZAC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index. It was launched on Nov 25, 2014. GABF is an actively managed fund by Gabelli. It was launched on May 9, 2022.
Performance
NZAC vs. GABF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NZAC vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | -5.23% | 20.55% | 16.67% | 23.22% | -2.41% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | -9.92% | 3.60% | 44.38% | 38.92% | 0.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NZAC achieves a -5.23% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -9.92% return.
NZAC
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- -5.23%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- 17.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
GABF
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- YTD
- -9.92%
- 6M
- -12.00%
- 1Y
- -3.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NZAC vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison
NZAC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
NZAC vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank
NZAC
GABF
NZAC vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NZAC | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | -0.15 | +1.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | -0.05 | +1.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.99 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | -0.18 | +1.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.70 | -0.47 | +7.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NZAC | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | -0.15 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.86 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between NZAC and GABF is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NZAC vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison
NZAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than GABF's 2.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 2.01% | 1.90% | 1.88% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.59% | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.20% | 2.00% | 2.40% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 2.18% | 1.96% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NZAC vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NZAC drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZAC and GABF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NZAC | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | -20.86% | -12.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | -17.16% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.27% | -14.35% | +7.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -4.63% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 6.43% | -3.86% |
Volatility
NZAC vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) at 5.73%. This indicates that NZAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NZAC | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 5.73% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 13.63% | -3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.91% | 22.80% | -4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 20.70% | -3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 20.70% | -3.61% |