PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NZAC vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NZAC and VOO is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

NZAC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
6.60%
10.98%
NZAC
VOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NZAC:

1.42

VOO:

1.88

Sortino Ratio

NZAC:

1.96

VOO:

2.53

Omega Ratio

NZAC:

1.25

VOO:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

NZAC:

2.33

VOO:

2.81

Martin Ratio

NZAC:

8.51

VOO:

11.78

Ulcer Index

NZAC:

2.12%

VOO:

2.02%

Daily Std Dev

NZAC:

12.73%

VOO:

12.67%

Max Drawdown

NZAC:

-33.72%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

NZAC:

-0.16%

VOO:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NZAC achieves a 4.38% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 4.61% return. Over the past 10 years, NZAC has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.35%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.


NZAC

YTD

4.38%

1M

3.16%

6M

5.91%

1Y

18.86%

5Y*

10.48%

10Y*

9.35%

VOO

YTD

4.61%

1M

2.59%

6M

10.08%

1Y

25.10%

5Y*

14.79%

10Y*

13.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NZAC vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NZAC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
Expense ratio chart for NZAC: current value at 0.12% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.12%
Expense ratio chart for VOO: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NZAC vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NZAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NZAC is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NZAC is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NZAC is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NZAC is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NZAC is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NZAC is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NZAC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NZAC, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.421.88
The chart of Sortino ratio for NZAC, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.962.53
The chart of Omega ratio for NZAC, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.251.35
The chart of Calmar ratio for NZAC, currently valued at 2.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.332.81
The chart of Martin ratio for NZAC, currently valued at 8.51, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.5111.78
NZAC
VOO

The current NZAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NZAC and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.42
1.88
NZAC
VOO

Dividends

NZAC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

NZAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
1.80%1.88%1.65%1.81%1.62%1.59%2.17%2.53%2.20%2.00%2.40%0.18%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.19%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

NZAC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NZAC drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZAC and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.16%
0
NZAC
VOO

Volatility

NZAC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 3.01% and 3.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.01%
3.01%
NZAC
VOO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab