GXTG vs. IDV
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) are both Global Equities funds - GXTG tracks the Solactive Thematic Growth Index while IDV tracks the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXTG returned -12.79%/yr vs 13.37%/yr for IDV. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for IDV.
Performance
GXTG vs. IDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than IDV's 16.13% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- -4.66%
- 3Y*
- -2.08%
- 5Y*
- -12.79%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.19%
IDV
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 16.13%
- 1Y
- 33.14%
- 3Y*
- 25.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $123.03K | $106.22K | $198.85K | |
| $33.20M | $33.97M | $40.15M |
GXTG vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.80% | 3.52% | -3.55% | 10.26% | -48.08% | 3.21% | 61.07% | 4.74% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 16.13% | 52.16% | 4.00% | 10.32% | -6.40% | 12.00% | -5.94% | 5.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and IDV is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019 | 0.56 |
The correlation between GXTG and IDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GXTG vs. IDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXTG
IDV
Technology
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Technology
GXTG
IDV
Basic Materials
GXTG
IDV
Utilities
GXTG
IDV
Communication Services
GXTG
IDV
Consumer Cyclical
GXTG
IDV
Healthcare
GXTG
IDV
-
Industrials
GXTG
IDV
Real Estate
GXTG
IDV
Financial Services
GXTG
IDV
Consumer Defensive
GXTG
-
IDV
Energy
GXTG
-
IDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
IDV
GXTG vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXTG | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.47 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 3.91 | -4.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | 12.13 | -12.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, roughly equal to the maximum IDV drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and IDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -70.14% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -8.52% | -20.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.14% | -11.86% | -17.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -29.19% | -31.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.76% | 0.00% | -59.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.43% | -15.29% | -28.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.71% | 2.74% | +9.97% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison
Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 13.53% compared to iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) at 2.76%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | IDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.53% | 2.76% | +10.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.87% | 10.91% | +14.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.66% | 13.05% | +18.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.78% | 15.53% | +13.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 17.62% | +12.53% |
GXTG vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than IDV's 5.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.47% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF | 5.12% | 4.94% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 7.33% | 5.78% | 5.47% | 5.15% | 5.93% | 4.52% | 4.69% | 5.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and IDV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXTG has higher volatility (13.53%) compared to IDV (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs IDV's -70.14%.
On 5-year performance, IDV leads with 13.37% vs -12.79% for GXTG. On fees, IDV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, IDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDV has performed better with a 13.37% return vs -12.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXTG.
IDV has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 1.47% for GXTG.
GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.49% for IDV.
IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and IDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer