GXTG vs. GTPE
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and GTPE (Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF) are both Global Equities funds - GXTG tracks the Solactive Thematic Growth Index while GTPE tracks the MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
GXTG vs. GTPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 25.21% return, which is significantly higher than GTPE's 19.43% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 25.21%
- 6M
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- -7.87%
- 10Y*
- —
GTPE
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 9.33%
- YTD
- 19.43%
- 6M
- 20.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXTG vs. GTPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 25.21% | -9.76% |
GTPE Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF | 19.43% | 2.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and GTPE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. GTPE — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
GTPE
GXTG vs. GTPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF (GTPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXTG | GTPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXTG | GTPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 2.34 | -2.23 |
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. GTPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than GTPE's maximum drawdown of -8.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and GTPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | GTPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -8.91% | -58.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.50% | -0.09% | -50.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.09% | -1.66% | -41.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.35% | — | — |
Volatility
GXTG vs. GTPE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | GTPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.52% | 17.21% | +8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 17.21% | +10.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.59% | 17.21% | +12.38% |
GXTG vs. GTPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GXTG and GTPE have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
GXTG vs. GTPE - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while GTPE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTPE Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.12% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and GTPE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXTG and GTPE have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for GTPE.
GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while GTPE tracks MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Goldman Sachs.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and GTPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer