GTPE vs. GBIL
GTPE (Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTPE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker Index, while GBIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GTPE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.
Performance
GTPE vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTPE achieves a 19.83% return, which is significantly higher than GBIL's 2.03% return.
GTPE
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 17.02%
- YTD
- 19.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GBIL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 3.76%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $54.21M | $51.93M | $68.82M | |
| $14.14K | $53.53K | $77.01K |
GTPE vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GTPE Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF | 19.83% | 2.96% |
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 2.03% | 0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTPE and GBIL is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTPE vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank
GTPE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GBIL
GTPE vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF (GTPE) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTPE | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 93.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 188.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2,263.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTPE vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTPE drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTPE and GBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTPE | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -0.76% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -0.04% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
GTPE vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTPE | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 0.21% | +17.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 0.58% | +17.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 0.47% | +17.69% |
GTPE vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTPE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTPE vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison
GTPE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 3.67% | 4.02% | 4.93% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% |
GTPE Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTPE and GBIL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GTPE.
GBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.00% for GTPE.
GTPE is categorized as Global Equities, while GBIL is Government Bonds. GTPE tracks MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker Index, while GBIL tracks FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GTPE and 0.12% for GBIL.
Find the right allocation for GTPE and GBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer