GXTG vs. BOTZ
GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while BOTZ is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXTG returned -12.79%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for BOTZ. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GXTG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
GXTG vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXTG achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 2.42% return.
GXTG
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- -4.66%
- 3Y*
- -2.08%
- 5Y*
- -12.79%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.19%
BOTZ
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 9.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.54%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.70M | $30.05M | $37.12M | |
| $123.03K | $106.22K | $198.85K |
GXTG vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.80% | 3.52% | -3.55% | 10.26% | -48.08% | 3.21% | 61.07% | 4.74% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 2.42% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXTG and BOTZ is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019 | 0.76 |
The correlation between GXTG and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
GXTG vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXTG
BOTZ
Technology
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Technology
GXTG
BOTZ
Basic Materials
GXTG
BOTZ
Utilities
GXTG
BOTZ
Communication Services
GXTG
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
GXTG
BOTZ
Healthcare
GXTG
BOTZ
Industrials
GXTG
BOTZ
Real Estate
GXTG
BOTZ
-
Financial Services
GXTG
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
GXTG
-
BOTZ
Energy
GXTG
-
BOTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXTG vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
GXTG
BOTZ
GXTG vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXTG | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.08 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 0.50 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | 1.27 | -1.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXTG vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXTG drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXTG and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXTG | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -55.54% | -12.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -19.34% | -9.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.14% | -29.02% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -55.54% | -5.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.76% | -10.86% | -48.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.43% | -18.22% | -25.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.71% | 7.67% | +5.04% |
Volatility
GXTG vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG) has a higher volatility of 13.53% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 9.53%. This indicates that GXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXTG | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.53% | 9.53% | +4.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.87% | 21.87% | +4.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.66% | 26.60% | +5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.78% | 27.33% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 25.90% | +4.25% |
GXTG vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXTG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXTG vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than BOTZ's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.47% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.47% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXTG and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXTG has higher volatility (13.53%) compared to BOTZ (9.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXTG dropped -67.81% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 5-year performance, BOTZ leads with 1.54% vs -12.79% for GXTG. On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 1.54% return vs -12.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.47% for BOTZ.
GXTG is categorized as Global Equities, while BOTZ is Artificial Intelligence. GXTG tracks Solactive Thematic Growth Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXTG and 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXTG and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer