BOTZ vs. ROBO
BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) and ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) are both Robotics funds - BOTZ tracks the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index while ROBO tracks the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BOTZ returned 1.83%/yr vs 5.88%/yr for ROBO. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BOTZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ROBO.
Performance
BOTZ vs. ROBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than ROBO's 21.38% return.
BOTZ
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 6.30%
- 1Y
- 21.96%
- 3Y*
- 8.95%
- 5Y*
- 1.83%
- 10Y*
- —
ROBO
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 21.38%
- 6M
- 21.93%
- 1Y
- 47.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.88%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
BOTZ vs. ROBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 4.55% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 31.80% | -28.34% | 58.01% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 21.38% | 23.71% | -1.28% | 23.74% | -33.92% | 15.34% | 45.26% | 29.51% | -20.92% | 44.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOTZ and ROBO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016 | 0.92 |
The correlation between BOTZ and ROBO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
BOTZ vs. ROBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BOTZ
ROBO
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
BOTZ
ROBO
Technology
BOTZ
ROBO
Healthcare
BOTZ
ROBO
Consumer Cyclical
BOTZ
ROBO
Communication Services
BOTZ
ROBO
Financial Services
BOTZ
ROBO
Energy
BOTZ
ROBO
-
Consumer Defensive
BOTZ
ROBO
Basic Materials
BOTZ
ROBO
-
Utilities
BOTZ
ROBO
-
Real Estate
BOTZ
-
ROBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOTZ vs. ROBO — Risk / Return Rank
BOTZ
ROBO
BOTZ vs. ROBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOTZ | ROBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 2.73 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.74 | 10.38 | -6.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOTZ vs. ROBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than ROBO's maximum drawdown of -43.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and ROBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOTZ | ROBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.54% | -43.65% | -11.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -17.35% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.02% | -27.92% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.54% | -43.65% | -11.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.01% | -6.87% | -2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.28% | -12.91% | -5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.89% | 4.56% | +1.33% |
Volatility
BOTZ vs. ROBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) is 9.36%, while ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) has a volatility of 10.87%. This indicates that BOTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOTZ | ROBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | 10.87% | -1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.68% | 20.00% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.21% | 24.64% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.95% | 23.96% | +2.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.80% | 23.32% | +2.48% |
BOTZ vs. ROBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOTZ vs. ROBO - Dividend Comparison
BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than ROBO's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.63% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.02% | 0.19% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BOTZ and ROBO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ROBO has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to BOTZ (9.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs ROBO's -43.65%.
On 5-year performance, ROBO leads with 5.88% vs 1.83% for BOTZ. On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ROBO has performed better with a 5.88% return vs 1.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.
BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.35% for ROBO.
BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.95% for ROBO.
ROBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOTZ and ROBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer