PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BOTZ vs. IRBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

BOTZ vs. IRBO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) and IRBO (iShares Future AI & Tech ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds - BOTZ tracks the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index while IRBO tracks the Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BOTZ returned 1.12%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for IRBO. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BOTZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IRBO.

Performance

BOTZ vs. IRBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than IRBO's 43.11% return.

BOTZ

1D
2.02%
1M
-3.90%
6M
-2.50%
YTD
-0.78%
1Y
9.01%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
1.12%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
9.87%

IRBO

1D
3.39%
1M
-3.07%
6M
32.62%
YTD
43.11%
1Y
63.16%
3Y*
28.37%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
15.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

BOTZ

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
$29.33M$29.66M$37.04M

IRBO

iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
$35.64M$36.90M$59.33M

BOTZ vs. IRBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF		-0.78%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-22.66%
IRBO
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF		43.11%29.97%8.02%36.37%-37.89%6.32%48.85%34.47%-13.76%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and IRBO is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.85

The correlation between BOTZ and IRBO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOTZ vs. IRBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
BOTZ
IRBO

Industrials

50.8%
4.7%

Technology

30.8%
83.8%

Healthcare

8.0%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
2.9%

Communication Services

4.2%
5.5%

Financial Services

0.9%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%
3.2%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Industrials

BOTZ
50.8%
IRBO
4.7%

Technology

BOTZ
30.8%
IRBO
83.8%

Healthcare

BOTZ
8.0%
IRBO
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BOTZ
6.2%
IRBO
2.9%

Communication Services

BOTZ
4.2%
IRBO
5.5%

Financial Services

BOTZ
0.9%
IRBO

-

Energy

BOTZ
0.5%
IRBO

-

Consumer Defensive

BOTZ
0.0%
IRBO
0.0%

Basic Materials

BOTZ
0.0%
IRBO

-

Utilities

BOTZ
0.0%
IRBO
3.2%

Real Estate

BOTZ

-

IRBO
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF

iShares Future AI & Tech ETF

Often compared with BOTZ:
BOTZ vs. ROBOBOTZ vs. AIQBOTZ vs. ARKQBOTZ vs. ROBTBOTZ vs. SPYBOTZ vs. QQQBOTZ vs. ARTY
Often compared with IRBO:
IRBO vs. ROBOIRBO vs. AIQIRBO vs. ROBTIRBO vs. ARKQIRBO vs. IBOTIRBO vs. IGPTIRBO vs. KOMP

Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. IRBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
IRBO
IRBO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IRBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IRBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRBO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BOTZ vs. IRBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

BOTZIRBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.34
1.70

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.66
2.18

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.28

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

2.64

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.18

8.49

-7.31

BOTZ vs. IRBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the IRBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and IRBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. IRBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, roughly equal to the maximum IRBO drawdown of -54.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and IRBO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

BOTZIRBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-54.50%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-24.00%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

-32.44%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

-50.53%

-5.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.65%

-14.61%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.22%

-19.68%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.64%

7.46%

+0.18%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. IRBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) is 9.24%, while iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) has a volatility of 14.41%. This indicates that BOTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

BOTZIRBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.24%

14.41%

-5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.66%

33.09%

-11.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.47%

37.42%

-10.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.29%

30.34%

-3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.89%

28.65%

-2.76%

BOTZ vs. IRBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IRBO's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOTZ vs. IRBO - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, more than IRBO's 0.06% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF		0.49%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
IRBO
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF		0.06%0.00%0.50%0.88%0.75%2.41%0.53%0.69%0.34%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

BOTZ and IRBO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRBO has higher volatility (14.41%) compared to BOTZ (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs IRBO's -54.50%.

On 5-year performance, IRBO leads with 10.52% vs 1.12% for BOTZ. On fees, IRBO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IRBO has performed better with a 10.52% return vs 1.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IRBO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.06% for IRBO.

BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while IRBO tracks Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.47% for IRBO.

IRBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ and IRBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer