PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPT vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPT vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPT achieves a 16.86% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 4.54% return.


GXPT

1D
-3.44%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
16.86%
6M
15.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XYLD

1D
-0.89%
1M
0.36%
YTD
4.54%
6M
4.43%
1Y
16.08%
3Y*
11.33%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPT vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPT and XYLD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPT vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXPT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPT vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXPTXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.99

GXPT vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXPT vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPTXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-33.46%

+14.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.72%

-0.93%

-7.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-3.70%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

Volatility

GXPT vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPTXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.91%

6.86%

+16.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.91%

11.26%

+11.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.91%

14.19%

+8.72%

GXPT vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXPT vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than XYLD's 10.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXPT
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF
0.12%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.53%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXPT and XYLD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.53%, compared with 0.12% for GXPT.

GXPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPT and 0.60% for XYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPT and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer