GXPT vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GXPT charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

GXPT vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPT achieves a 25.98% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.

GXPT

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: 17.05%
• YTD: 25.98%
• 6M: 24.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMH

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 25.87%
• YTD: 77.13%
• 6M: 75.61%
• 1Y: 157.20%
• 3Y*: 64.17%
• 5Y*: 39.21%
• 10Y*: 37.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPT vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	25.98%	10.78%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	77.13%	26.04%

Correlation

The correlation between GXPT and SMH is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

GXPT vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 96
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPT vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GXPT	SMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.23	0.34	+1.89

Drawdowns

GXPT vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXPT	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.74%	-84.96%	+66.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	0.00%	-1.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-41.09%	+36.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GXPT	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.22%	30.56%	-9.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.22%	35.01%	-13.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.22%	32.57%	-11.35%

GXPT vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXPT vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than SMH's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	0.11%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.17%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXPT and SMH in my portfolio?

GXPT and SMH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GXPT or SMH?

On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXPT or SMH?

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXPT or SMH?

SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.11% for GXPT.

What is the main difference between GXPT and SMH?

GXPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPT and 0.35% for SMH.