PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPT vs. RACK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPT vs. RACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GXPT

1D
2.85%
1M
3.36%
YTD
21.16%
6M
21.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RACK

1D
3.50%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPT vs. RACK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPT and RACK is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPT vs. RACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXPT vs. RACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXPT vs. RACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, which is greater than RACK's maximum drawdown of -12.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and RACK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPTRACKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-12.62%

-6.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.36%

0.00%

-5.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-4.72%

-0.30%

Volatility

GXPT vs. RACK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPTRACKDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.70%

58.37%

-35.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.70%

58.37%

-35.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.70%

58.37%

-35.67%

GXPT vs. RACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RACK's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXPT vs. RACK - Dividend Comparison

GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while RACK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GXPT and RACK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RACK.

GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for RACK.

GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index, while RACK tracks MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPT and 0.50% for RACK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPT and RACK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer