PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RACK vs. BIZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RACK vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RACK

1D
-2.11%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIZD

1D
2.25%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
-6.93%
6M
-8.73%
1Y
-10.64%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
7.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RACK vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RACK and BIZD is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026

-1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RACK vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RACK

BIZD
BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RACK vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RACK vs. BIZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RACKBIZDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-5.75

0.31

-6.06

Drawdowns

RACK vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RACK drawdown since its inception was -2.16%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RACK and BIZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RACKBIZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-55.44%

+53.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-17.45%

+15.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.11%

-6.72%

+5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.68%

Volatility

RACK vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RACKBIZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

18.25%

+4.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.03%

17.43%

+5.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.03%

21.74%

+1.29%

RACK vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RACK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BIZD's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

RACK vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison

RACK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.57%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
13.57%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%
RACK
VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RACK and BIZD have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BIZD is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BIZD is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RACK.

BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.57%, compared with 0.00% for RACK.

RACK is categorized as Technology Equities, while BIZD is Financials Equities. RACK tracks MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RACK and 0.42% for BIZD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RACK and BIZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer