RACK vs. AIPO
RACK (VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while AIPO is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RACK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
RACK vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RACK
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AIPO
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- -4.58%
- 6M
- 20.17%
- YTD
- 33.86%
- 1Y
- 46.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 45.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.27M | $38.04M | $47.00M | |
| $1.13M | $2.03M | $2.83M |
RACK vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF | -10.35% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | -9.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between RACK and AIPO is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RACK vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
RACK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AIPO
RACK vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RACK | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.93 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.41 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RACK vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RACK drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, smaller than the maximum AIPO drawdown of -24.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RACK and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RACK | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.97% | -24.36% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.50% | -14.84% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -5.31% | -4.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.33% | — |
Volatility
RACK vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RACK | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.87% | 37.61% | +14.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.87% | 37.27% | +14.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.87% | 37.27% | +14.60% |
RACK vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RACK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
RACK vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
RACK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, RACK and AIPO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, RACK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RACK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.
AIPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for RACK.
RACK is categorized as Technology Equities, while AIPO is Artificial Intelligence. RACK tracks MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RACK and 0.69% for AIPO.
Find the right allocation for RACK and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer