PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPT vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPT vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPT achieves a 25.98% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 11.15% return.


GXPT

1D
-1.60%
1M
17.05%
YTD
25.98%
6M
24.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BOTZ

1D
-0.91%
1M
4.92%
YTD
11.15%
6M
13.89%
1Y
29.53%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPT vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPT and BOTZ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.68

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPT vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXPT

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPT vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXPT vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXPTBOTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.23

0.44

+1.79

Drawdowns

GXPT vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPTBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-55.54%

+36.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-3.27%

+1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-18.32%

+13.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

Volatility

GXPT vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPTBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.22%

23.98%

-2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.22%

26.73%

-5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.22%

25.73%

-4.51%

GXPT vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXPT vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.59%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
GXPT
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF
0.11%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXPT and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.11% for GXPT.

GXPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPT and 0.68% for BOTZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPT and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer