PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPS vs. FSTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPS vs. FSTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPS achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly higher than FSTA's 5.79% return.


GXPS

1D
0.91%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
7.14%
6M
5.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FSTA

1D
0.60%
1M
-3.29%
YTD
5.79%
6M
4.33%
1Y
1.01%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPS vs. FSTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPS and FSTA is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPS vs. FSTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXPS

FSTA
FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPS vs. FSTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXPS vs. FSTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXPSFSTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.61

-0.17

Drawdowns

GXPS vs. FSTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPS drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum FSTA drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPS and FSTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPSFSTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-25.13%

+15.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.97%

-8.55%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-3.55%

-0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

Volatility

GXPS vs. FSTA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPSFSTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.97%

12.38%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

13.11%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.97%

14.56%

-0.59%

GXPS vs. FSTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTA's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXPS vs. FSTA - Dividend Comparison

GXPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than FSTA's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
2.25%2.34%2.25%2.66%2.26%2.15%2.47%2.46%3.01%2.42%2.53%2.86%
GXPS
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
0.56%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, GXPS and FSTA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GXPS.

FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.56% for GXPS.

GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GXPS and 0.08% for FSTA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPS and FSTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer