GXPS vs. FSTA
GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) and FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - GXPS tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index while FSTA tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GXPS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FSTA.
Performance
GXPS vs. FSTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPS achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly higher than FSTA's 5.79% return.
GXPS
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 7.14%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSTA
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- 5.79%
- 6M
- 4.33%
- 1Y
- 1.01%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
GXPS vs. FSTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 7.14% | -1.72% |
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 5.79% | -3.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPS and FSTA is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPS vs. FSTA — Risk / Return Rank
GXPS
FSTA
GXPS vs. FSTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXPS | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.61 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
GXPS vs. FSTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPS drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum FSTA drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPS and FSTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPS | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -25.13% | +15.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.97% | -8.55% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.87% | -3.55% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.54% | — |
Volatility
GXPS vs. FSTA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPS | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 12.38% | +1.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 13.11% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 14.56% | -0.59% |
GXPS vs. FSTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTA's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXPS vs. FSTA - Dividend Comparison
GXPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than FSTA's 2.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.25% | 2.34% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% |
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 0.56% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, GXPS and FSTA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GXPS.
FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.56% for GXPS.
GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GXPS and 0.08% for FSTA.
Find the right allocation for GXPS and FSTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer