PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTA vs. VDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTA vs. VDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSTA having a 7.00% return and VDC slightly lower at 6.86%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSTA having a 7.72% annualized return and VDC not far ahead at 7.74%.


FSTA

1D
-0.69%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
7.00%
6M
6.51%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
7.72%

VDC

1D
-0.71%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
6.86%
6M
6.42%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
7.47%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
7.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTA vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
7.00%1.82%13.31%2.29%-1.72%17.44%10.96%26.84%-8.49%12.71%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
6.86%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTA and VDC is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.99

The correlation between FSTA and VDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSTA vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSTA
VDC

Consumer Defensive

97.6%
97.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
1.7%

Industrials

0.3%
0.3%

Basic Materials

0.3%
0.4%

Healthcare

0.0%
0.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

FSTA
97.6%
VDC
97.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FSTA
1.7%
VDC
1.7%

Industrials

FSTA
0.3%
VDC
0.3%

Basic Materials

FSTA
0.3%
VDC
0.4%

Healthcare

FSTA
0.0%
VDC
0.0%

Communication Services

FSTA

-

VDC

-

Energy

FSTA

-

VDC

-

Financial Services

FSTA

-

VDC

-

Real Estate

FSTA

-

VDC

-

Technology

FSTA

-

VDC

-

Utilities

FSTA

-

VDC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTA vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTA
FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTA vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSTAVDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.08

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

0.55

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

1.09

-0.05

FSTA vs. VDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is comparable to the VDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTA and VDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSTA vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum VDC drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and VDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTAVDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.13%

-34.24%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-9.28%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.76%

-11.78%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

-16.55%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.13%

-25.31%

+0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.50%

-7.56%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.56%

-3.73%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

4.65%

+0.04%

Volatility

FSTA vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) have volatilities of 4.84% and 4.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTAVDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

4.82%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

10.20%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

12.69%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.15%

13.18%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.60%

14.68%

-0.08%

FSTA vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSTA vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison

FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than VDC's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
2.24%2.34%2.25%2.66%2.26%2.15%2.47%2.46%3.01%2.42%2.53%2.86%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.15%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FSTA and VDC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSTA has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to VDC (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs VDC's -34.24%.

On 10-year performance, VDC leads with 7.74% vs 7.72% for FSTA. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VDC has performed better with a 7.74% return vs 7.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VDC.

FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 2.15% for VDC.

FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.09% for VDC.

VDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTA and VDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer