FSTA vs. SCHD
FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSTA is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSTA returned 7.91%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for SCHD. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSTA charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
FSTA vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTA has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 7.91%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.
FSTA
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 8.88%
- 1Y
- 5.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
FSTA vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 8.86% | 1.82% | 13.31% | 2.29% | -1.72% | 17.44% | 10.96% | 26.84% | -8.49% | 12.71% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.72% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTA and SCHD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FSTA and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FSTA vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSTA
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
FSTA
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
FSTA
SCHD
Industrials
FSTA
SCHD
Basic Materials
FSTA
SCHD
Healthcare
FSTA
SCHD
Communication Services
FSTA
-
SCHD
Energy
FSTA
-
SCHD
Financial Services
FSTA
-
SCHD
Real Estate
FSTA
-
SCHD
-
Technology
FSTA
-
SCHD
Utilities
FSTA
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSTA vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
FSTA
SCHD
FSTA vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSTA | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.40 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 5.35 | -4.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 12.94 | -11.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSTA vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTA | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.13% | -33.37% | +8.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.29% | -4.61% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.76% | -16.13% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.58% | -16.85% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.13% | -33.37% | +8.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.90% | -2.47% | -3.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.56% | -3.31% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 1.90% | +2.81% |
Volatility
FSTA vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that FSTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSTA | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 3.58% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 7.73% | +2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.79% | 11.07% | +1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 14.36% | -1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 16.71% | -2.12% |
FSTA vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FSTA vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than SCHD's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.20% | 2.34% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSTA and SCHD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSTA has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.72% vs 7.91% for FSTA. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FSTA.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 2.20% for FSTA.
FSTA is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSTA and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer