GXPS vs. RSPS
GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) and RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - GXPS tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index while RSPS tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC. Both are passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXPS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPS.
Performance
GXPS vs. RSPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPS achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly higher than RSPS's 4.59% return.
GXPS
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- 9.89%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPS
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 4.59%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- 2.06%
- 3Y*
- -0.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
GXPS vs. RSPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 9.89% | -1.72% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 4.59% | -4.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPS and RSPS is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPS vs. RSPS — Risk / Return Rank
GXPS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPS
GXPS vs. RSPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXPS | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPS vs. RSPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPS drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum RSPS drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPS and RSPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPS | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -35.93% | +26.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.61% | -8.68% | +3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -5.06% | +1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.43% | — |
Volatility
GXPS vs. RSPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPS | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.24% | 14.05% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 13.70% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 14.92% | -0.68% |
GXPS vs. RSPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPS vs. RSPS - Dividend Comparison
GXPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than RSPS's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 0.54% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.97% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPS and RSPS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.
RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.54% for GXPS.
GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GXPS and 0.40% for RSPS.
Find the right allocation for GXPS and RSPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer