GXPS vs. PBJ
GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) and PBJ (Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - GXPS tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index while PBJ tracks the Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GXPS returned 9.65% vs 0.71% for PBJ. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GXPS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PBJ.
Performance
GXPS vs. PBJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPS achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly higher than PBJ's 6.56% return.
GXPS
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 9.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.08%
PBJ
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- 6M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 6.56%
- 1Y
- 0.71%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $477.47K | $522.19K | $752.04K | |
| $442.68K | $1.59M | $808.88K |
GXPS vs. PBJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 10.23% | -1.72% |
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 6.56% | -7.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPS and PBJ is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.70 |
The correlation between GXPS and PBJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPS vs. PBJ — Risk / Return Rank
GXPS
PBJ
GXPS vs. PBJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXPS | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.02 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 0.06 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | 0.14 | +1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPS vs. PBJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPS drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum PBJ drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPS and PBJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPS | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -39.15% | +29.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.20% | -11.38% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.32% | -6.33% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -5.39% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.83% | 5.06% | -0.23% |
Volatility
GXPS vs. PBJ - Volatility Comparison
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) at 4.57%. This indicates that GXPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPS | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 4.57% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 10.08% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 13.08% | +1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 13.89% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 15.16% | -0.25% |
GXPS vs. PBJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PBJ's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPS vs. PBJ - Dividend Comparison
GXPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than PBJ's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 1.26% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 1.29% | 1.83% | 1.11% | 1.81% | 1.82% | 0.90% | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 0.70% | 1.56% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPS and PBJ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXPS has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to PBJ (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXPS dropped -9.20% vs PBJ's -39.15%.
On 1-year performance, GXPS leads with 9.65% vs 0.71% for PBJ. On fees, GXPS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PBJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GXPS has performed better with a 9.65% return vs 0.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GXPS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PBJ.
PBJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 1.26% for GXPS.
GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while PBJ tracks Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GXPS and 0.63% for PBJ.
GXPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXPS and PBJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer