FSTA vs. RTH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) and RTH (VanEck Retail ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSTA is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while RTH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSTA returned 7.71%/yr vs 14.09%/yr for RTH. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FSTA charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RTH.

Performance

FSTA vs. RTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and VanEck Retail ETF (RTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than RTH's 7.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTA has underperformed RTH with an annualized return of 7.71%, while RTH has yielded a comparatively higher 14.09% annualized return.

FSTA

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -0.07%
• 6M: 2.66%
• YTD: 10.31%
• 1Y: 8.39%
• 3Y*: 7.67%
• 5Y*: 6.88%
• 10Y*: 7.71%
• ALL TIME*: 8.56%

RTH

• 1D: 2.96%
• 1M: 3.43%
• 6M: 2.95%
• YTD: 7.50%
• 1Y: 13.69%
• 3Y*: 15.58%
• 5Y*: 9.75%
• 10Y*: 14.09%
• ALL TIME*: 9.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF	$6.81M	$6.37M	$6.76M
RTH VanEck Retail ETF	$1.33M	$1.20M	$1.33M

FSTA vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF	10.31%	1.82%	13.31%	2.29%	-1.72%	17.44%	10.96%	26.84%	-8.49%	12.71%
RTH VanEck Retail ETF	7.50%	12.36%	20.02%	20.07%	-17.67%	24.94%	31.62%	29.06%	3.87%	22.45%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTA and RTH is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	0.63

The correlation between FSTA and RTH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSTA vs. RTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSTA	RTH
Consumer Defensive	96.6%	28.2%
Consumer Cyclical	1.2%	53.8%
Basic Materials	0.4%	-
Technology	0.4%	-
Industrials	0.3%	3.0%
Healthcare	0.0%	15.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FSTA vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSTA

FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 27
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 24

RTH

RTH Risk / Return Rank: 39
RTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
RTH Omega Ratio Rank: 35
RTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
RTH Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSTA vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and VanEck Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSTA	RTH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	0.93	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.03	1.46	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.17	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	1.57	-0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.77	4.34	-2.57

FSTA vs. RTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the RTH Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTA and RTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSTA vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum RTH drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and RTH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSTA	RTH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.13%	-42.32%	+17.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.29%	-7.83%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.13%	-13.80%	+2.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.58%	-25.00%	+8.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.13%	-25.00%	-0.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.64%	-0.65%	-3.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.58%	-7.32%	+3.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.99%	2.83%	+2.16%

Volatility

FSTA vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to VanEck Retail ETF (RTH) at 5.18%. This indicates that FSTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSTA	RTH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.93%	5.18%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.45%	10.54%	+0.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.81%	13.28%	+0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.41%	16.96%	-3.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.68%	17.62%	-2.94%

FSTA vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSTA vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison

FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than RTH's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF	2.17%	2.34%	2.25%	2.66%	2.26%	2.15%	2.47%	2.46%	3.01%	2.42%	2.53%	2.86%
RTH VanEck Retail ETF	0.90%	0.97%	0.77%	1.07%	1.16%	0.78%	0.64%	0.91%	1.05%	1.56%	1.84%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSTA and RTH in my portfolio?

FSTA and RTH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSTA or RTH?

FSTA has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to RTH (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs RTH's -42.32%.

Which ETF is better, FSTA or RTH?

On 10-year performance, RTH leads with 14.09% vs 7.71% for FSTA. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RTH has been the lower-risk option at 5.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSTA or RTH?

Over the 10-year period, RTH has performed better with a 14.09% return vs 7.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSTA or RTH?

FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RTH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSTA or RTH?

FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.90% for RTH.

What is the main difference between FSTA and RTH?

FSTA is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while RTH is Consumer Discretionary Equities. FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.35% for RTH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.