PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTA vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTA vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSTA having a 10.31% return and SPY slightly lower at 10.13%. Over the past 10 years, FSTA has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 7.71%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.07% annualized return.


FSTA

1D
-0.46%
1M
-0.07%
6M
2.66%
YTD
10.31%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
7.67%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
7.71%
ALL TIME*
8.56%

SPY

1D
0.72%
1M
0.30%
6M
8.53%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.07%
ALL TIME*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.81M$6.37M$6.76M
$37.27B$35.99B$39.23B

FSTA vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
10.31%1.82%13.31%2.29%-1.72%17.44%10.96%26.84%-8.49%12.71%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.13%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTA and SPY is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.57

The correlation between FSTA and SPY shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FSTA vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSTA
SPY

Consumer Defensive

96.6%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%
8.9%

Basic Materials

0.4%
1.9%

Technology

0.4%
36.9%

Industrials

0.3%
7.6%

Healthcare

0.0%
9.4%

Communication Services

-

9.7%

Energy

-

3.4%

Financial Services

-

12.5%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Consumer Defensive

FSTA
96.6%
SPY
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FSTA
1.2%
SPY
8.9%

Basic Materials

FSTA
0.4%
SPY
1.9%

Technology

FSTA
0.4%
SPY
36.9%

Industrials

FSTA
0.3%
SPY
7.6%

Healthcare

FSTA
0.0%
SPY
9.4%

Communication Services

FSTA

-

SPY
9.7%

Energy

FSTA

-

SPY
3.4%

Financial Services

FSTA

-

SPY
12.5%

Real Estate

FSTA

-

SPY
2.0%

Utilities

FSTA

-

SPY
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTA vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSTA
FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSTA vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSTASPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.27

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

2.20

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.77

9.40

-7.63

FSTA vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTA and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSTA vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTASPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.13%

-55.19%

+30.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-8.88%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.13%

-18.76%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

-24.50%

+7.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.13%

-33.72%

+8.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.64%

-1.40%

-3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-9.01%

+5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.99%

2.08%

+2.91%

Volatility

FSTA vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.58%. This indicates that FSTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTASPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.93%

3.58%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

10.14%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.81%

12.89%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.41%

17.18%

-3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.68%

17.95%

-3.27%

FSTA vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSTA vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
2.17%2.34%2.25%2.66%2.26%2.15%2.47%2.46%3.01%2.42%2.53%2.86%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTA and SPY have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTA has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to SPY (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.07% vs 7.71% for FSTA. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.07% return vs 7.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPY.

FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.

FSTA is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTA and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer