GXPS vs. XLP
GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - GXPS tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index while XLP tracks the S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GXPS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.
Performance
GXPS vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPS achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly higher than XLP's 6.36% return.
GXPS
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 7.14%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLP
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 7.20%
GXPS vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 7.14% | -1.72% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 6.36% | -3.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPS and XLP is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPS vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
GXPS
XLP
GXPS vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXPS | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.43 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
GXPS vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPS drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum XLP drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPS and XLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPS | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -35.90% | +26.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.97% | -8.21% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.87% | -7.06% | +3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.93% | — |
Volatility
GXPS vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPS | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 12.66% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 13.29% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 14.73% | -0.76% |
GXPS vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXPS vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
GXPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than XLP's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 0.56% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.65% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, GXPS and XLP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GXPS.
XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.56% for GXPS.
GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while XLP tracks S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GXPS and 0.08% for XLP.
Find the right allocation for GXPS and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer