GVUS vs. MFVL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GVUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. GVUS is passively managed, while MFVL is actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GVUS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFVL.

Performance

GVUS vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVUS achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's 0.39% return.

GVUS

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 4.34%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 6M: 14.89%
• 1Y: 28.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFVL

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVUS vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF	14.24%	1.36%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.39%	1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GVUS and MFVL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	0.54

Return for Risk

GVUS vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVUS

GVUS Risk / Return Rank: 82
GVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
GVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
GVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 80
GVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
GVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVUS vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GVUS	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.24	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.70	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GVUS	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.55	0.31	+1.24

Drawdowns

GVUS vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and MFVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GVUS	MFVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.82%	-7.03%	-8.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.29%	+3.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.01%	-2.42%	+0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GVUS	MFVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.14%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.86%	12.15%	-1.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.28%	12.15%	+1.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.28%	12.15%	+1.13%

GVUS vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

GVUS vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison

GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF	1.58%	1.77%	2.04%	0.00%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GVUS and MFVL in my portfolio?

GVUS and MFVL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GVUS or MFVL?

On fees, GVUS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GVUS or MFVL?

GVUS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFVL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GVUS or MFVL?

GVUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.

What is the main difference between GVUS and MFVL?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GVUS and 0.50% for MFVL.