GVUS vs. HDV
GVUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - GVUS tracks the Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross while HDV tracks the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GVUS returned 28.22% vs 20.35% for HDV. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GVUS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
GVUS vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVUS achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 12.69% return.
GVUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
GVUS vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 14.24% | 15.90% | 14.08% | 5.51% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.69% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 3.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVUS and HDV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.67 |
The correlation between GVUS and HDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GVUS vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GVUS
HDV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
GVUS
HDV
Technology
GVUS
HDV
Industrials
GVUS
HDV
Healthcare
GVUS
HDV
Communication Services
GVUS
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
GVUS
HDV
Consumer Defensive
GVUS
HDV
Energy
GVUS
HDV
Utilities
GVUS
HDV
Real Estate
GVUS
HDV
-
Basic Materials
GVUS
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVUS vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
GVUS
HDV
GVUS vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GVUS | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.36 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 3.95 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.70 | 11.02 | +6.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GVUS | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 2.10 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.55 | 0.72 | +0.83 |
Drawdowns
GVUS vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVUS | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -37.04% | +21.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | -5.18% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.54% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -3.09% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 1.85% | -0.25% |
Volatility
GVUS vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) is 3.01%, while iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that GVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVUS | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 3.19% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.14% | 7.56% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.86% | 9.73% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 12.82% | +0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 15.73% | -2.45% |
GVUS vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GVUS vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than HDV's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 1.58% | 1.77% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVUS and HDV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to GVUS (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVUS dropped -15.82% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 1-year performance, GVUS leads with 28.22% vs 20.35% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GVUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GVUS has performed better with a 28.22% return vs 20.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GVUS.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.58% for GVUS.
GVUS tracks Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GVUS and 0.08% for HDV.
GVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVUS and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer