PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVIP vs. GSEW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVIP vs. GSEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVIP achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than GSEW's 13.35% return.


GVIP

1D
2.70%
1M
-4.11%
6M
6.65%
YTD
11.37%
1Y
24.89%
3Y*
26.05%
5Y*
11.62%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.71%

GSEW

1D
1.15%
1M
0.64%
6M
9.99%
YTD
13.35%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.42M$6.65M$6.37M
$2.26M$1.87M$2.02M

GVIP vs. GSEW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
11.37%25.27%29.82%39.15%-31.95%11.86%44.12%30.21%-6.85%4.29%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
13.35%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%25.43%16.28%31.04%-8.11%7.72%

Correlation

The correlation between GVIP and GSEW is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017

0.83

The correlation between GVIP and GSEW shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GVIP vs. GSEW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GVIP
GSEW

Technology

37.9%
18.3%

Financial Services

15.5%
15.1%

Communication Services

11.7%
3.9%

Industrials

11.1%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
9.9%

Healthcare

8.6%
12.0%

Utilities

5.9%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
5.7%

Basic Materials

-

4.3%

Energy

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

4.3%

Technology

GVIP
37.9%
GSEW
18.3%

Financial Services

GVIP
15.5%
GSEW
15.1%

Communication Services

GVIP
11.7%
GSEW
3.9%

Industrials

GVIP
11.1%
GSEW
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GVIP
9.4%
GSEW
9.9%

Healthcare

GVIP
8.6%
GSEW
12.0%

Utilities

GVIP
5.9%
GSEW
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

GVIP
1.2%
GSEW
5.7%

Basic Materials

GVIP

-

GSEW
4.3%

Energy

GVIP

-

GSEW
4.2%

Real Estate

GVIP

-

GSEW
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVIP vs. GSEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GVIP
GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GVIP vs. GSEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GVIPGSEWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.28

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

2.51

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.80

9.71

-3.91

GVIP vs. GSEW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the GSEW Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVIP and GSEW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GVIP vs. GSEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVIP drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, roughly equal to the maximum GSEW drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVIP and GSEW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVIPGSEWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.09%

-38.65%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.36%

-7.72%

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.29%

-18.18%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.09%

-25.74%

-11.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.02%

0.00%

-10.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-5.80%

-1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

1.99%

+2.31%

Volatility

GVIP vs. GSEW - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a higher volatility of 9.97% compared to Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) at 2.69%. This indicates that GVIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVIPGSEWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.97%

2.69%

+7.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.44%

9.22%

+11.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.41%

12.28%

+11.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.28%

16.93%

+5.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.03%

19.08%

+2.95%

GVIP vs. GSEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVIP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GSEW's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVIP vs. GSEW - Dividend Comparison

GVIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than GSEW's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.36%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%0.00%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
0.30%0.34%0.29%0.77%0.02%0.00%0.12%0.77%0.44%0.45%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVIP and GSEW have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVIP has higher volatility (9.97%) compared to GSEW (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVIP dropped -37.09% vs GSEW's -38.65%.

On 5-year performance, GVIP leads with 11.62% vs 8.71% for GSEW. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GVIP has performed better with a 11.62% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVIP.

GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.30% for GVIP.

GVIP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GSEW is Large Cap Blend Equities. GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index, while GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GVIP and 0.09% for GSEW.

GSEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVIP and GSEW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer