GVIP vs. SPY
GVIP (Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GVIP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GVIP returned 10.95%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GVIP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
GVIP vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVIP achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.13% return.
GVIP
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -6.63%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 21.61%
- 3Y*
- 24.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.95%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.41%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.23M | $1.88M | $2.26M | |
| $37.27B | $35.99B | $39.23B |
GVIP vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 8.45% | 25.27% | 29.82% | 39.15% | -31.95% | 11.86% | 44.12% | 30.21% | -6.85% | 25.79% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.13% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVIP and SPY is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2016 | 0.89 |
The correlation between GVIP and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
GVIP vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GVIP
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
GVIP
SPY
Financial Services
GVIP
SPY
Communication Services
GVIP
SPY
Industrials
GVIP
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
GVIP
SPY
Healthcare
GVIP
SPY
Utilities
GVIP
SPY
Consumer Defensive
GVIP
SPY
Basic Materials
GVIP
-
SPY
Energy
GVIP
-
SPY
Real Estate
GVIP
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVIP vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
GVIP
SPY
GVIP vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GVIP | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.27 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 2.20 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 9.40 | -4.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GVIP vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVIP drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVIP and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVIP | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.09% | -55.19% | +18.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.36% | -8.88% | -7.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.29% | -18.76% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.09% | -24.50% | -12.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.39% | -1.40% | -10.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -9.01% | +1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 2.08% | +2.18% |
Volatility
GVIP vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.58%. This indicates that GVIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVIP | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 3.58% | +6.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.33% | 10.14% | +10.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.29% | 12.89% | +10.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 17.18% | +5.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 17.95% | +4.07% |
GVIP vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVIP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVIP vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
GVIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 0.31% | 0.34% | 0.29% | 0.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.77% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVIP and SPY have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVIP has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to SPY (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVIP dropped -37.09% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 12.76% vs 10.95% for GVIP. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 10.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVIP.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.31% for GVIP.
GVIP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GVIP and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVIP and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer