GUSH vs. BNKU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) and BNKU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - GUSH tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%) while BNKU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GUSH returned 49.53% vs 111.56% for BNKU. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GUSH charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BNKU.

Performance

GUSH vs. BNKU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 61.19% return, which is significantly higher than BNKU's 14.86% return.

GUSH

• 1D: 2.06%
• 1M: -5.00%
• YTD: 61.19%
• 6M: 49.15%
• 1Y: 49.53%
• 3Y*: 8.93%
• 5Y*: 9.46%
• 10Y*: -36.52%

BNKU

• 1D: 5.30%
• 1M: 29.28%
• YTD: 14.86%
• 6M: 15.82%
• 1Y: 111.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSH vs. BNKU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares	61.19%	-26.81%
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	14.86%	34.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSH and BNKU is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.17

The correlation between GUSH and BNKU shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GUSH vs. BNKU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GUSH	BNKU
Energy	97.2%	-
Basic Materials	2.9%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GUSH vs. BNKU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSH

GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 31
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 28
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 30

BNKU

BNKU Risk / Return Rank: 58
BNKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BNKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BNKU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BNKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
BNKU Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSH vs. BNKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GUSH	BNKU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.94	-1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	2.30	-0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.30	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	2.74	-1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.77	7.20	-3.43

GUSH vs. BNKU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSH Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the BNKU Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSH and BNKU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GUSH vs. BNKU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than BNKU's maximum drawdown of -61.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and BNKU.

Drawdown Indicators

	GUSH	BNKU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.98%	-61.21%	-38.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.94%	-40.97%	+12.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.80%	-2.63%	-97.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-92.90%	-18.05%	-74.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.16%	15.55%	-2.39%

Volatility

GUSH vs. BNKU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a higher volatility of 18.07% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) at 15.55%. This indicates that GUSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNKU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GUSH	BNKU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.07%	15.55%	+2.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.41%	45.72%	-1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.06%	57.72%	-1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.35%	73.10%	-4.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.58%	73.10%	+20.48%

GUSH vs. BNKU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than BNKU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GUSH vs. BNKU - Dividend Comparison

GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, while BNKU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares	1.55%	2.60%	2.96%	3.00%	0.47%	0.00%	0.20%	1.68%	0.17%	0.00%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GUSH and BNKU in my portfolio?

GUSH and BNKU have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GUSH or BNKU?

GUSH has higher volatility (18.07%) compared to BNKU (15.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSH dropped -99.98% vs BNKU's -61.21%.

Which ETF is better, GUSH or BNKU?

On 1-year performance, BNKU leads with 111.56% vs 49.53% for GUSH. On fees, BNKU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BNKU has been the lower-risk option at 15.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GUSH or BNKU?

Over the 1-year period, BNKU has performed better with a 111.56% return vs 49.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GUSH or BNKU?

BNKU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GUSH or BNKU?

GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.00% for BNKU.

What is the main difference between GUSH and BNKU?

GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%), while BNKU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 0.95% for BNKU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.