PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSH vs. BRZU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUSH vs. BRZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 84.27% return, which is significantly higher than BRZU's 25.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GUSH has underperformed BRZU with an annualized return of -34.13%, while BRZU has yielded a comparatively higher -19.05% annualized return.


GUSH

1D
2.66%
1M
29.75%
6M
50.64%
YTD
84.27%
1Y
87.82%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
20.49%
10Y*
-34.13%
ALL TIME*
-41.90%

BRZU

1D
0.98%
1M
12.57%
6M
-6.32%
YTD
25.69%
1Y
83.60%
3Y*
6.48%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
-19.05%
ALL TIME*
-29.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.63M$1.55M$2.54M
$34.81M$32.68M$31.93M

GUSH vs. BRZU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
84.27%-19.39%-12.73%-7.23%66.47%129.94%-97.38%-52.68%-74.28%-40.21%
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
25.69%97.99%-57.07%55.48%8.30%-39.23%-91.34%57.02%-37.21%30.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSH and BRZU is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015

0.37

The correlation between GUSH and BRZU shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GUSH vs. BRZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GUSH
BRZU

Energy

95.1%
15.1%

Basic Materials

4.3%
14.5%

Industrials

0.7%
11.6%

Technology

0.6%
0.4%

Communication Services

-

2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Financial Services

-

34.5%

Healthcare

-

2.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

13.5%

Energy

GUSH
95.1%
BRZU
15.1%

Basic Materials

GUSH
4.3%
BRZU
14.5%

Industrials

GUSH
0.7%
BRZU
11.6%

Technology

GUSH
0.6%
BRZU
0.4%

Communication Services

GUSH

-

BRZU
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GUSH

-

BRZU
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

GUSH

-

BRZU
4.7%

Financial Services

GUSH

-

BRZU
34.5%

Healthcare

GUSH

-

BRZU
2.2%

Real Estate

GUSH

-

BRZU

-

Utilities

GUSH

-

BRZU
13.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUSH vs. BRZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BRZU
BRZU Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BRZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRZU Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BRZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRZU Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GUSH vs. BRZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GUSHBRZUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.28

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.36

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

5.48

-0.80

GUSH vs. BRZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSH Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the BRZU Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSH and BRZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GUSH vs. BRZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, roughly equal to the maximum BRZU drawdown of -99.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and BRZU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSHBRZUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-99.71%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.18%

-35.97%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.59%

-58.25%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.64%

-62.89%

-10.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

-98.11%

-1.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.77%

-99.10%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.98%

-89.64%

-3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.04%

15.49%

+0.55%

Volatility

GUSH vs. BRZU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a higher volatility of 16.40% compared to Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) at 13.30%. This indicates that GUSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUSHBRZUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.40%

13.30%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.15%

38.80%

+6.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.92%

50.02%

+6.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.48%

54.96%

+12.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.83%

82.21%

+10.62%

GUSH vs. BRZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than BRZU's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUSH vs. BRZU - Dividend Comparison

GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than BRZU's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
1.79%2.39%8.73%3.24%4.70%6.29%0.78%0.95%1.04%0.74%0.00%
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.18%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUSH and BRZU have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GUSH has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to BRZU (13.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSH dropped -99.98% vs BRZU's -99.71%.

On 10-year performance, BRZU leads with -19.05% vs -34.13% for GUSH. On fees, GUSH is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, BRZU has been the lower-risk option at 13.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BRZU has performed better with a -19.05% return vs -34.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GUSH is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BRZU.

BRZU has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.18% for GUSH.

GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%), while BRZU tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 1.29% for BRZU.

BRZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUSH and BRZU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer