PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSH vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUSH vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 42.86% return, which is significantly higher than XLE's 22.58% return. Over the past 10 years, GUSH has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of -37.00%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.29% annualized return.


GUSH

1D
3.14%
1M
-18.97%
YTD
42.86%
6M
44.72%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
-37.00%

XLE

1D
1.26%
1M
-8.47%
YTD
22.58%
6M
23.97%
1Y
26.32%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
18.90%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSH vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
42.86%-19.39%-12.73%-7.23%66.47%129.94%-97.38%-52.68%-74.28%-40.21%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
22.58%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSH and XLE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015

0.90

The correlation between GUSH and XLE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

GUSH vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GUSH
XLE

Energy

96.8%
100.0%

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

GUSH
96.8%
XLE
100.0%

Basic Materials

GUSH
3.2%
XLE

-

Communication Services

GUSH

-

XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

GUSH

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

GUSH

-

XLE

-

Financial Services

GUSH

-

XLE

-

Healthcare

GUSH

-

XLE

-

Industrials

GUSH

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

GUSH

-

XLE

-

Technology

GUSH

-

XLE

-

Utilities

GUSH

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUSH vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSH vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GUSHXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.21

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

1.88

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

5.70

-4.03

GUSH vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSH Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSH and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GUSH vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSHXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-71.26%

-28.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.18%

-14.05%

-22.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.59%

-20.14%

-43.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.64%

-26.04%

-47.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

-66.81%

-33.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.83%

-12.96%

-86.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.91%

-17.97%

-74.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.92%

4.66%

+9.26%

Volatility

GUSH vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a higher volatility of 18.38% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 7.06%. This indicates that GUSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUSHXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.38%

7.06%

+11.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.33%

16.89%

+27.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.70%

20.96%

+35.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.20%

25.98%

+42.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.57%

29.62%

+63.95%

GUSH vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUSH vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than XLE's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.75%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.47%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUSH and XLE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GUSH has higher volatility (18.38%) compared to XLE (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSH dropped -99.98% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 9.29% vs -37.00% for GUSH. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 7.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 9.29% return vs -37.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 1.75% for GUSH.

GUSH is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%), while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUSH and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer