PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSH vs. DRIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUSH vs. DRIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 42.54% return, which is significantly higher than DRIP's -41.20% return. Over the past 10 years, GUSH has outperformed DRIP with an annualized return of -37.01%, while DRIP has yielded a comparatively lower -42.06% annualized return.


GUSH

1D
-0.22%
1M
-19.15%
YTD
42.54%
6M
41.51%
1Y
31.85%
3Y*
6.88%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
-37.01%

DRIP

1D
-0.94%
1M
18.92%
YTD
-41.20%
6M
-40.68%
1Y
-42.23%
3Y*
-27.26%
5Y*
-38.71%
10Y*
-42.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSH vs. DRIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
42.54%-19.39%-12.73%-7.23%66.47%129.94%-97.38%-52.68%-74.28%-40.21%
DRIP
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares
-41.20%-14.81%1.27%-17.24%-73.57%-79.74%-42.76%-36.11%49.62%-9.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSH and DRIP is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015

-0.99

The correlation between GUSH and DRIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUSH vs. DRIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIP
DRIP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DRIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIP Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIP Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSH vs. DRIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GUSHDRIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.90

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

-0.68

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.32

-1.25

+3.57

GUSH vs. DRIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSH Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the DRIP Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSH and DRIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GUSH vs. DRIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, roughly equal to the maximum DRIP drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and DRIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSHDRIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-99.95%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.18%

-62.18%

+26.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.59%

-76.02%

+12.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.64%

-96.24%

+22.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

-99.92%

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.83%

-99.93%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.92%

-90.46%

-2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.77%

33.75%

-19.98%

Volatility

GUSH vs. DRIP - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) have volatilities of 18.01% and 18.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUSHDRIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.01%

18.04%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.07%

43.68%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.58%

56.75%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.20%

68.37%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.43%

96.33%

-2.90%

GUSH vs. DRIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIP's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUSH vs. DRIP - Dividend Comparison

GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than DRIP's 3.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRIP
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares
3.36%2.86%4.38%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.96%0.58%0.00%0.00%
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.75%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUSH and DRIP have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIP has higher volatility (18.04%) compared to GUSH (18.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSH dropped -99.98% vs DRIP's -99.95%.

On 10-year performance, GUSH leads with -37.01% vs -42.06% for DRIP. On fees, DRIP is cheaper at 1.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GUSH has performed better with a -37.01% return vs -42.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRIP is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.

DRIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 1.75% for GUSH.

GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%), while DRIP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 1.07% for DRIP.

GUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUSH and DRIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer