BNKU vs. TQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ).
BNKU and TQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BNKU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 2, 2019. TQQQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010. Both BNKU and TQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BNKU or TQQQ.
Correlation
The correlation between BNKU and TQQQ is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BNKU vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BNKU:
100.79%
TQQQ:
57.26%
BNKU:
-39.15%
TQQQ:
-81.66%
BNKU:
-33.26%
TQQQ:
-33.44%
Returns By Period
BNKU
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
TQQQ
-21.79%
-27.36%
-7.50%
4.69%
35.28%
30.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BNKU vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BNKU and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BNKU vs. TQQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BNKU
TQQQ
BNKU vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
BNKU vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
BNKU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 1.62% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.03% |
Drawdowns
BNKU vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNKU drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKU and TQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BNKU vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) is NaN%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of NaN%. This indicates that BNKU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.