GUSH vs. XOP
GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) and XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GUSH is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%), while XOP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GUSH returned -37.01%/yr vs 3.09%/yr for XOP. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GUSH charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XOP.
Performance
GUSH vs. XOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 42.54% return, which is significantly higher than XOP's 23.89% return. Over the past 10 years, GUSH has underperformed XOP with an annualized return of -37.01%, while XOP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.09% annualized return.
GUSH
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -19.15%
- YTD
- 42.54%
- 6M
- 41.51%
- 1Y
- 31.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- -37.01%
XOP
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -9.39%
- YTD
- 23.89%
- 6M
- 23.68%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 3.09%
GUSH vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 42.54% | -19.39% | -12.73% | -7.23% | 66.47% | 129.94% | -97.38% | -52.68% | -74.28% | -40.21% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 23.89% | -2.15% | -1.00% | 3.56% | 45.37% | 66.74% | -36.40% | -9.44% | -28.10% | -9.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSH and XOP is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015 | 0.99 |
The correlation between GUSH and XOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
GUSH vs. XOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GUSH
XOP
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
GUSH
XOP
Basic Materials
GUSH
XOP
Communication Services
GUSH
-
XOP
-
Consumer Cyclical
GUSH
-
XOP
-
Consumer Defensive
GUSH
-
XOP
-
Financial Services
GUSH
-
XOP
-
Healthcare
GUSH
-
XOP
-
Industrials
GUSH
-
XOP
-
Real Estate
GUSH
-
XOP
-
Technology
GUSH
-
XOP
-
Utilities
GUSH
-
XOP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSH vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank
GUSH
XOP
GUSH vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GUSH | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.15 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.25 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | 3.50 | -1.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GUSH vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than XOP's maximum drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and XOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSH | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -90.27% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.18% | -18.50% | -17.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.59% | -34.98% | -28.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.64% | -34.98% | -38.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.94% | -82.61% | -17.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.83% | -42.09% | -57.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.92% | -42.58% | -50.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.77% | 6.60% | +7.17% |
Volatility
GUSH vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a higher volatility of 18.01% compared to SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) at 9.01%. This indicates that GUSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSH | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.01% | 9.01% | +9.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.07% | 21.96% | +22.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.58% | 28.30% | +28.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.20% | 33.88% | +34.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.43% | 40.25% | +53.18% |
GUSH vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than XOP's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSH vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison
GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than XOP's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.75% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% | 0.00% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 2.10% | 2.62% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 1.61% | 2.34% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, GUSH and XOP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GUSH has higher volatility (18.01%) compared to XOP (9.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSH dropped -99.98% vs XOP's -90.27%.
On 10-year performance, XOP leads with 3.09% vs -37.01% for GUSH. On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XOP has been the lower-risk option at 9.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XOP has performed better with a 3.09% return vs -37.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.
XOP has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.75% for GUSH.
GUSH is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XOP is Energy Equities. GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%), while XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 0.35% for XOP.
XOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GUSH and XOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer