PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSH vs. XOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUSH vs. XOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 42.54% return, which is significantly higher than XOP's 23.89% return. Over the past 10 years, GUSH has underperformed XOP with an annualized return of -37.01%, while XOP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.09% annualized return.


GUSH

1D
-0.22%
1M
-19.15%
YTD
42.54%
6M
41.51%
1Y
31.85%
3Y*
6.88%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
-37.01%

XOP

1D
0.09%
1M
-9.39%
YTD
23.89%
6M
23.68%
1Y
23.02%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
3.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSH vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
42.54%-19.39%-12.73%-7.23%66.47%129.94%-97.38%-52.68%-74.28%-40.21%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
23.89%-2.15%-1.00%3.56%45.37%66.74%-36.40%-9.44%-28.10%-9.47%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSH and XOP is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015

0.99

The correlation between GUSH and XOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

GUSH vs. XOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GUSH
XOP

Energy

96.8%
96.8%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

GUSH
96.8%
XOP
96.8%

Basic Materials

GUSH
3.2%
XOP
3.2%

Communication Services

GUSH

-

XOP

-

Consumer Cyclical

GUSH

-

XOP

-

Consumer Defensive

GUSH

-

XOP

-

Financial Services

GUSH

-

XOP

-

Healthcare

GUSH

-

XOP

-

Industrials

GUSH

-

XOP

-

Real Estate

GUSH

-

XOP

-

Technology

GUSH

-

XOP

-

Utilities

GUSH

-

XOP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUSH vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

XOP
XOP Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSH vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GUSHXOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.15

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

1.25

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.32

3.50

-1.18

GUSH vs. XOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSH Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the XOP Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSH and XOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GUSH vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than XOP's maximum drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and XOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSHXOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-90.27%

-9.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.18%

-18.50%

-17.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.59%

-34.98%

-28.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.64%

-34.98%

-38.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

-82.61%

-17.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.83%

-42.09%

-57.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.92%

-42.58%

-50.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.77%

6.60%

+7.17%

Volatility

GUSH vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a higher volatility of 18.01% compared to SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) at 9.01%. This indicates that GUSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUSHXOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.01%

9.01%

+9.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.07%

21.96%

+22.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.58%

28.30%

+28.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.20%

33.88%

+34.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.43%

40.25%

+53.18%

GUSH vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than XOP's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUSH vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison

GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than XOP's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.75%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%0.00%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
2.10%2.62%2.45%2.63%2.47%1.61%2.34%1.47%0.99%0.76%0.76%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, GUSH and XOP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GUSH has higher volatility (18.01%) compared to XOP (9.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSH dropped -99.98% vs XOP's -90.27%.

On 10-year performance, XOP leads with 3.09% vs -37.01% for GUSH. On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XOP has been the lower-risk option at 9.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XOP has performed better with a 3.09% return vs -37.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.

XOP has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.75% for GUSH.

GUSH is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XOP is Energy Equities. GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%), while XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 0.35% for XOP.

XOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUSH and XOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer