BNKU vs. HIBL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BNKU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs) and HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - BNKU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%) while HIBL tracks the S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BNKU returned 107.99% vs 276.75% for HIBL. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BNKU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for HIBL.

Performance

BNKU vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKU achieves a 8.32% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 95.37% return.

BNKU

• 1D: 10.09%
• 1M: 13.36%
• YTD: 8.32%
• 6M: 19.85%
• 1Y: 107.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HIBL

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 31.17%
• YTD: 95.37%
• 6M: 95.99%
• 1Y: 276.75%
• 3Y*: 62.38%
• 5Y*: 11.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKU vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	8.32%	46.04%
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares	95.37%	38.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKU and HIBL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.68

The correlation between BNKU and HIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

BNKU vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BNKU	HIBL
Financial Services	100.0%	12.5%
Basic Materials	-	4.6%
Communication Services	-	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.6%
Energy	-	2.2%
Healthcare	-	2.9%
Industrials	-	11.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	45.8%
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

BNKU vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKU

BNKU Risk / Return Rank: 50
BNKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BNKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
BNKU Omega Ratio Rank: 48
BNKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BNKU Martin Ratio Rank: 44

HIBL

HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 89
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKU vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNKU	HIBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	4.23	-2.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	3.59	-1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.46	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	8.88	-6.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.00	32.55	-25.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BNKU vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKU Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the HIBL Sharpe Ratio of 4.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKU and HIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNKU	HIBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	4.23	-2.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.24	+0.34

Drawdowns

BNKU vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKU drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKU and HIBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKU	HIBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.03%	-88.27%	+30.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.97%	-31.39%	-9.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-69.66%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-81.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.18%	-2.70%	-5.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.53%	-44.17%	+27.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.49%	8.55%	+6.94%

Volatility

BNKU vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) is 16.53%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 21.02%. This indicates that BNKU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKU	HIBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.53%	21.02%	-4.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.00%	50.42%	-4.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.51%	65.96%	-8.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.26%	82.15%	-8.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.26%	91.87%	-18.61%

BNKU vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNKU vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

BNKU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares	1.18%	2.43%	0.82%	0.69%	0.00%	0.06%	0.19%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKU and HIBL in my portfolio?

BNKU and HIBL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNKU or HIBL?

HIBL has higher volatility (21.02%) compared to BNKU (16.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKU dropped -58.03% vs HIBL's -88.27%.

Which ETF is better, BNKU or HIBL?

On 1-year performance, HIBL leads with 276.75% vs 107.99% for BNKU. On fees, BNKU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BNKU has been the lower-risk option at 16.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNKU or HIBL?

Over the 1-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 276.75% return vs 107.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKU or HIBL?

BNKU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNKU or HIBL?

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.00% for BNKU.

What is the main difference between BNKU and HIBL?

BNKU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKU and 1.12% for HIBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.