PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BNKU vs. FNGU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNKU vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.85%
34.55%
BNKU
FNGU

Returns By Period


BNKU

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

FNGU

YTD

108.49%

1M

7.13%

6M

34.55%

1Y

146.18%

5Y (annualized)

60.59%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


BNKUFNGU

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BNKU vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BNKU and FNGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


BNKU
MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs
Expense ratio chart for BNKU: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for FNGU: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between BNKU and FNGU is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BNKU vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BNKU, currently valued at 2.97, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.972.06
The chart of Sortino ratio for BNKU, currently valued at 3.61, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.612.39
The chart of Omega ratio for BNKU, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.551.32
The chart of Calmar ratio for BNKU, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.612.39
The chart of Martin ratio for BNKU, currently valued at 19.10, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0019.108.50
BNKU
FNGU

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.97
2.06
BNKU
FNGU

Dividends

BNKU vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNKU nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BNKU vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-55.71%
-13.22%
BNKU
FNGU

Volatility

BNKU vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) is 0.00%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 20.89%. This indicates that BNKU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
20.89%
BNKU
FNGU