PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSA vs. GSST
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GUSA vs. GSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GUSA vs. GSST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GUSA
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF
-4.40%17.51%24.46%26.61%-12.69%
GSST
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF
0.76%5.20%6.01%6.08%0.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSA achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly lower than GSST's 0.76% return.


GUSA

1D
2.88%
1M
-5.10%
YTD
-4.40%
6M
-2.11%
1Y
17.78%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
10Y*

GSST

1D
0.06%
1M
0.04%
YTD
0.76%
6M
1.89%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GUSA vs. GSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSA has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than GSST's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

GUSA vs. GSST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSA
GUSA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

GSST
GSST Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSST Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
GSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSST Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSA vs. GSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUSAGSSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

6.29

-5.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

11.28

-9.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

3.26

-2.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

18.26

-16.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.99

113.51

-106.52

GUSA vs. GSST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the GSST Sharpe Ratio of 6.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSA and GSST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUSAGSSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

6.29

-5.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

5.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

3.72

-3.05

Correlation

The correlation between GUSA and GSST is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GUSA vs. GSST - Dividend Comparison

GUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than GSST's 4.43% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
GUSA
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF
1.11%0.99%1.16%1.36%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSST
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF
4.43%4.56%5.45%4.98%1.97%0.71%1.12%1.66%

Drawdowns

GUSA vs. GSST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSA drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, which is greater than GSST's maximum drawdown of -3.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSA and GSST.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSAGSSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-3.51%

-16.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-0.25%

-12.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.39%

0.00%

-6.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-0.17%

-4.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

0.04%

+2.57%

Volatility

GUSA vs. GSST - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) at 0.25%. This indicates that GUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GUSAGSSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

0.25%

+5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

0.42%

+9.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.13%

0.73%

+17.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

0.63%

+16.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.47%

0.87%

+16.60%