GUSA vs. GSUS
GUSA (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF) and GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GUSA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GSUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GUSA returned 22.23%/yr vs 22.74%/yr for GSUS. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GUSA charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for GSUS.
Performance
GUSA vs. GSUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GUSA having a 10.84% return and GSUS slightly lower at 10.67%.
GUSA
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 6M
- 10.82%
- 1Y
- 27.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- —
GUSA vs. GSUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF | 10.84% | 17.51% | 24.46% | 26.61% | -12.69% |
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 10.67% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -12.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSA and GSUS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2022 | 0.99 |
The correlation between GUSA and GSUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
GUSA vs. GSUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GUSA
GSUS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
GUSA
GSUS
Financial Services
GUSA
GSUS
Communication Services
GUSA
GSUS
Consumer Cyclical
GUSA
GSUS
Industrials
GUSA
GSUS
Healthcare
GUSA
GSUS
Consumer Defensive
GUSA
GSUS
Energy
GUSA
GSUS
Utilities
GUSA
GSUS
Real Estate
GUSA
GSUS
Basic Materials
GUSA
GSUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSA vs. GSUS — Risk / Return Rank
GUSA
GSUS
GUSA vs. GSUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GUSA | GSUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.42 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 3.02 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.20 | 13.70 | +0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUSA | GSUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.33 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 1.12 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
GUSA vs. GSUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSA drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, smaller than the maximum GSUS drawdown of -25.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSA and GSUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSA | GSUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.61% | -25.62% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -9.24% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.61% | -19.07% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.74% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -5.27% | +0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 2.03% | -0.08% |
Volatility
GUSA vs. GSUS - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) at 2.91%. This indicates that GUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSA | GSUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 2.91% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 9.05% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.21% | 12.00% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 17.05% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 17.06% | +0.21% |
GUSA vs. GSUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSA has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than GSUS's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GUSA vs. GSUS - Dividend Comparison
GUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than GSUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% |
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.16% | 1.36% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, GUSA and GSUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GUSA has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to GSUS (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSA dropped -19.61% vs GSUS's -25.62%.
On 3-year performance, GSUS leads with 22.74% vs 22.23% for GUSA. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, GSUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 22.74% return vs 22.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for GUSA.
GSUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.96% for GUSA.
GUSA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GSUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. GUSA tracks Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for GUSA and 0.07% for GSUS.
GSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GUSA and GSUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer