PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSA vs. GSUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUSA vs. GSUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GUSA having a 10.84% return and GSUS slightly lower at 10.67%.


GUSA

1D
-0.62%
1M
5.16%
YTD
10.84%
6M
10.82%
1Y
27.69%
3Y*
22.23%
5Y*
10Y*

GSUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.20%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.52%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
13.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSA vs. GSUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GUSA
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF
10.84%17.51%24.46%26.61%-12.69%
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
10.67%18.11%25.25%27.74%-12.54%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSA and GSUS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2022

0.99

The correlation between GUSA and GSUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

GUSA vs. GSUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GUSA
GSUS

Technology

34.0%
35.6%

Financial Services

11.6%
11.7%

Communication Services

11.1%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
10.2%

Industrials

9.4%
8.0%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.9%

Energy

3.6%
3.6%

Utilities

2.3%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.7%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.7%

Technology

GUSA
34.0%
GSUS
35.6%

Financial Services

GUSA
11.6%
GSUS
11.7%

Communication Services

GUSA
11.1%
GSUS
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GUSA
10.3%
GSUS
10.2%

Industrials

GUSA
9.4%
GSUS
8.0%

Healthcare

GUSA
8.8%
GSUS
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

GUSA
4.7%
GSUS
4.9%

Energy

GUSA
3.6%
GSUS
3.6%

Utilities

GUSA
2.3%
GSUS
2.2%

Real Estate

GUSA
2.2%
GSUS
1.7%

Basic Materials

GUSA
2.0%
GSUS
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUSA vs. GSUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSA
GUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

GSUS
GSUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSA vs. GSUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUSAGSUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

3.02

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.20

13.70

+0.50

GUSA vs. GSUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSA Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the GSUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSA and GSUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUSAGSUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.33

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

1.12

-0.24

Drawdowns

GUSA vs. GSUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSA drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, smaller than the maximum GSUS drawdown of -25.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSA and GSUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSAGSUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-25.62%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-9.24%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.61%

-19.07%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.74%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-5.27%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.03%

-0.08%

Volatility

GUSA vs. GSUS - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) at 2.91%. This indicates that GUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUSAGSUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

2.91%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

9.05%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.21%

12.00%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

17.05%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

17.06%

+0.21%

GUSA vs. GSUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSA has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than GSUS's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GUSA vs. GSUS - Dividend Comparison

GUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than GSUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.04%1.19%1.32%1.51%1.13%0.78%
GUSA
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF
0.96%0.99%1.16%1.36%1.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GUSA and GSUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GUSA has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to GSUS (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSA dropped -19.61% vs GSUS's -25.62%.

On 3-year performance, GSUS leads with 22.74% vs 22.23% for GUSA. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, GSUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 22.74% return vs 22.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for GUSA.

GSUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.96% for GUSA.

GUSA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GSUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. GUSA tracks Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for GUSA and 0.07% for GSUS.

GSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUSA and GSUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer