GUSA vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
GUSA and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GUSA is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Apr 5, 2022. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both GUSA and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GUSA or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between GUSA and VOO is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GUSA vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GUSA:
1.71
VOO:
1.76
GUSA:
2.32
VOO:
2.37
GUSA:
1.31
VOO:
1.32
GUSA:
2.58
VOO:
2.66
GUSA:
10.45
VOO:
11.10
GUSA:
2.13%
VOO:
2.02%
GUSA:
13.01%
VOO:
12.79%
GUSA:
-19.30%
VOO:
-33.99%
GUSA:
-2.39%
VOO:
-2.11%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GUSA having a 2.31% return and VOO slightly higher at 2.40%.
GUSA
2.31%
-1.55%
7.63%
19.45%
N/A
N/A
VOO
2.40%
-1.05%
7.47%
19.81%
14.27%
13.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GUSA vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSA has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GUSA vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GUSA
VOO
GUSA vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GUSA vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
GUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than VOO's 1.22% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF | 1.14% | 1.16% | 1.36% | 1.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.22% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
GUSA vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSA drawdown since its inception was -19.30%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSA and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GUSA vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.38%. This indicates that GUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.